Polls | Gaza | Fact Checker | Support Us
Sign In | Join Free |
UK FACT CHECK POLITICS
UK FACT CHECK POLITICS
 Voting intention Labour Lab 28% Reform Ref 24% Con Con 17% Lib Dem LD 10% Green Grn 10% Poll tracker

Menu

Topics
About
Get Involved
Follow Us

Account

Trial of live facial recognition in London stations leads to a false positive and no arrests

theguardian.com 29 September 2026 at 16:16 View original article →

The original link is the material being checked. It may contain false or misleading claims — we link for transparency, not endorsement.

88/100
Verdict High Trust Highly Reliable — Verified Original Reporting (with promotional boilerplate contamination)

The article is a Guardian news report (bylines: Phoebe Davis and Daniel Boffey, dated 29 September 2026) on a six-month British Transport Police (BTP) live facial recognition (LFR) trial at London railway stations.

✓ 12 checks out ✕ 0 disputed ? 6 unverified
☰ Full analysis The complete summary ⌄

The article is a Guardian news report (bylines: Phoebe Davis and Daniel Boffey, dated 29 September 2026) on a six-month British Transport Police (BTP) live facial recognition (LFR) trial at London railway stations. Its core factual spine — £320,786 cost, 18 deployments, more than half a million faces scanned between February and July 2026, almost 100 police officer hours, a single watchlist alert that was a false positive, and zero LFR-derived arrests — derives from a freedom of information document obtained by Liberty Investigates and shared with the Guardian, and is corroborated verbatim by Liberty Investigates' own published investigation of the same date plus independent syndication (AOL UK, inkl). Secondary contextual claims were independently confirmed against primary sources: BTP's own website and press release confirm the pilot began on 11 February 2026 and was expanded in August 2026 to Transport for London Underground stations, running until November 2026; TfL's official press release confirms the violence-against-women-and-girls framing quoted; Facewatch and Biometric Update confirm Fraser Sampson's former role as UK Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner and his current Facewatch non-executive directorship; parliamentary publications confirm the Joint Committee on Human Rights AI report; and the ICO's August 2026 audit findings confirm the oversight-board reference. No claim in the news body was found to be false. The main integrity issues are not factual but structural: the ingested text is contaminated with navigation furniture, 'most viewed' lists and a long Guardian fundraising appeal whose US-politics assertions (Trump's ban on CNN/MS NOW/Politico, the FCC-ABC/Kimmel episode, the Stars and Stripes firings) are editorially selective advocacy copy rather than reported journalism — though those specific assertions also check out against CNN, NBC News, Forbes and Newsweek reporting. The self_reference_count of 53 is almost entirely attributable to this appeal, not to the reporting. Sourcing is one-sided in weighting (civil-liberties investigators, a critical Labour MP, a commercially interested former regulator) but BTP's rebuttal is quoted at length, preserving balance. Two items are marked Unverified: the specific 'almost 100 police hours' figure and the 'three positive confirmed alerts since the extension' figure, which appear only in the Guardian/Liberty Investigates chain and are not independently published by BTP.

What checked out (12)
  • A six-month BTP live facial recognition trial in London railway stations cost more than £320,000 — specifically £320,786 for equipment hire and police staffing across 18 deployments — and produced one watchlist alert that was an incorrect identification (false positive) and no arrests. Corroborated by the underlying Liberty Investigates FOI-based investigation (https://libertyinvestigates.org.uk/articles/live-facial-recognition-btp-trial-london-stations/) and independent syndication (https://www.aol.co.uk/articles/trial-live-facial-recognition-cameras-094829000.html).
  • More than half a million faces were scanned between February and July 2026 at London transport hubs during the trial. Confirmed in the Liberty Investigates primary write-up of the FOI document.
  • The BTP pilot began in February 2026 and was extended for a further four months with expansion into London Underground stations, announced in August 2026. Confirmed by primary source BTP (https://www.btp.police.uk/news/btp/news/england/btp-expands-live-facial-recognition-lfr-trial-into-london-underground-stations/ and https://www.btp.police.uk/police-forces/british-transport-police/areas/about-us/about-us/facial-recognition-technology/), which states the pilot began on 11 February 2026, was expanded in August 2026 and runs until November 2026.
  • Transport for London, announcing support for the extension, said LFR would target people on police watchlists at key stations chosen for maximum impact and would specifically tackle violence against women and girls whose travel behaviours are shaped by experiences of sexual harassment and sexual offences. Confirmed against TfL's official press release (https://www.wired-gov.net/wg/news.nsf/articles/British+Transport+Police+trialling+live+facial+recognition+at+Transport+for+London+stations+11082026130500?open=).
  • Fraser Sampson is a former UK Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner and is now a non-executive director of Facewatch, a facial recognition company operating in shops. Confirmed by Facewatch (https://www.facewatch.co.uk/2023/11/14/facewatch-appoint-former-uk-biometirc-commisioner/) and Biometric Update (https://www.biometricupdate.com/202312/former-uk-biometrics-commissioner-joins-facewatch-in-advisory-role). The Guardian's disclosure of this commercial interest is a positive transparency marker.
  • Bell Ribeiro-Addy is the Labour MP for Clapham and Brixton Hill and made the quoted call for suspension of LFR rollout pending stronger safeguards and a proper legal framework. Confirmed by TheyWorkForYou (https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/25856/bell_ribeiro-addy/clapham_and_brixton_hill) and the identical quotation in the Liberty Investigates report.
  • Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights published a report calling for legislation on AI and human rights, identifying live facial recognition as a clear example of risk. Confirmed by the committee publication (https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/54971/documents/304882/default/) and contemporaneous trade coverage (https://eandt.theiet.org/2026/09/14/existing-uk-laws-ill-equipped-protect-human-rights-ai-warn-mps).
  • The Metropolitan police and the London mayor's office announced plans this summer for fixed LFR cameras in the West End, and Sadiq Khan has indicated the technology will be used on the newly pedestrianised Oxford Street. Confirmed by ITV News London (https://www.itv.com/news/london/2026-08-12/oxford-street-set-to-get-permanent-live-facial-recognition-cameras) and Local Government Lawyer (https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/community-safety/393-community-safety-news/100914-met-police-to-roll-out-permanent-static-facial-recognition-cameras-across-londons-west-end).
  • The ICO has recently reported on police LFR governance, including the role of force oversight boards — the basis for Sampson's reference. Confirmed by the ICO's own audit outcomes report (https://cy.ico.org.uk/media2/uo1cdoxm/police-forces-frt-outcomes-report-202608.pdf) and coverage at https://www.biometricupdate.com/202608/uk-ico-finds-police-facial-recognition-use-mostly-compliant-with-data-regulations.
  • The fundraising appeal's claim that Trump banned CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House and that a federal judge found the ban likely unconstitutional and temporarily restored access is accurate. Confirmed by CNN (https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/24/politics/trump-press-lawsuit-ruling-white-house-access) and NBC News (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/judge-ruling-white-house-restore-access-media-ban-cnn-politico-ms-now-rcna599391).
  • The appeal's claim that the Pentagon dismissed the Stars and Stripes editor-in-chief citing 'insubordination' following reporting connected to the USS Abraham Lincoln is substantiated by Forbes (https://www.forbes.com/sites/maryroeloffs/2026/08/22/stars-and-stripes-editor-says-hes-worried-about-military-censorship-after-fires-him-for-insubordination/), Newsweek (https://www.newsweek.com/pentagon-stars-and-stripes-staff-uss-abraham-lincoln-hegseth-news-lawsuit-12378483) and Al Jazeera (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/24/us-navy-confirms-eight-suicide-attempts-on-uss-lincoln-what-we-know).
  • The appeal's claim that the FCC moved against ABC following a Jimmy Kimmel joke about the First Lady is substantiated by Poynter (https://www.poynter.org/commentary/2026/trump-administration-abc-licences-jimmy-kimmel/), France 24 (https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20260428-comedian-kimmel-hits-back-at-trump-as-tensions-flare-after-melania-joke) and PBS News (https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trumps-call-for-abc-to-fire-jimmy-kimmel-again-after-morbid-joke-about-first-lady).
? Unverified claims 6 claims ⌄
  • 'Almost 100 hours of police officers' time' — this figure appears only in the Guardian and Liberty Investigates outputs drawn from the same FOI disclosure; the underlying FOI response was not independently retrievable, and BTP has not published a matching hours figure. Plausible and consistent, but single-chain sourced. Marked Unverified, not disputed.
  • 'Since the extension there had been three positive confirmed alerts of people who were subsequently confirmed to be complying with sexual harm prevention orders or other imposed court conditions' — attributed to a BTP spokesperson; no BTP publication or independent outlet reproduces this figure outside the Guardian/syndicated chain. Marked Unverified pending BTP's November 2026 pilot evaluation.
  • 'More than half of police forces in England and Wales have now deployed LFR on British streets' — correctly attributed in-text to a Liberty Investigates analysis, but the underlying force-by-force dataset was not independently audited here. Directionally consistent with prior Liberty Investigates work showing rapid expansion (https://libertyinvestigates.org.uk/articles/police-expand-use-of-facial-recognition-apps/), but the specific majority threshold is Unverified independently.
  • The BTP spokesperson's assertion that officers made 'a number of associated arrests' during deployments (assault, theft, offensive weapon, breach of a criminal behaviour order, public order) that were excluded from LFR performance data because they did not result directly from an LFR alert — an unquantified force claim that cannot be checked against published data. Unverified.
  • The exact quotations attributed to Fraser Sampson are Unverified as to provenance beyond the Guardian/Liberty Investigates reporting, although his stated roles and general position are verified. No contradiction found.
  • The sidebar headline 'Anthropic warns of existential AI risks to humanity in IPO document' and other 'most viewed' items were not researched: they are navigational furniture, not claims made by this article. Unverified and out of scope.
⌕ Sources & how we checked Search journal, source grades, confidence ⌄
Confidence

High (0.86) — Confidence is high because every checkable structural fact in the article — pilot dates, extension, Underground expansion, TfL's stated rationale, Sampson's dual roles and disclosed conflict, the MP's identity and quotation, the JCHR report, the ICO audit and the Met/Oxford Street rollout — was confirmed against primary institutional or parliamentary sources rather than secondary echoes, and no source contradicted any claim. Confidence is held below 0.95 for four reasons: the originating FOI document is not public, so the headline quantitative findings rest on two collaborating outlets rather than genuinely independent verification; two figures ('almost 100 police hours', 'three positive alerts since extension') are single-chain and remain Unverified; the story is only hours old at time of research, so downstream corrections or BTP rebuttals may not yet exist; and the ingested capture is stripped of hyperlinks and heavily contaminated with boilerplate, preventing a full audit of the article as published. Confidence would rise above 0.95 on publication of the FOI response or BTP's November 2026 pilot evaluation.

Search journal

British Transport Police live facial recognition trial £320,786 no arrests

BTP extends facial recognition trial London Underground four months

BTP live facial recognition trial February July 2026 deployments watchlist press release

BTP live facial recognition three positive alerts sexual harm prevention orders extension

Transport for London statement live facial recognition violence against women and girls stations

Fraser Sampson Facewatch non-executive director former biometrics commissioner

joint committee on human rights report AI human rights live facial recognition risk 2026

Sadiq Khan Oxford Street live facial recognition pedestrianised

Met police fixed live facial recognition cameras West End Croydon expand by Christmas

more than half of police forces England Wales deployed live facial recognition Liberty Investigates

ICO report police oversight boards live facial recognition accountability 2026

Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP Clapham and Brixton Hill facial recognition

Trump bans CNN MS Now Politico White House judge restores access Air Force One

Pentagon fires Stars and Stripes editor insubordination USS Lincoln suicide attempt

FCC ABC Jimmy Kimmel joke First Lady Meet the Press host Trump punish

Article metrics

Emotion 10% · Reading grade 17.3 · 2538 words

≡ The article we checked Full text as retrieved ⌄
[Skip to main content]( to navigation]( Close dialogue 1/1 Next image Previous image Toggle caption ## Support the Guardian Fund independent journalism with $10 per month [Support us]( us]( [Print subscriptions]( [Newsletters]( [Sign in]( US * [US edition]( * [UK edition]( * [Australia edition]( * [Europe edition]( * [International edition]( [The Guardian - Back to home The Guardian]( - [x] * [News]( * [Opinion]( * [Sport]( * [Culture]( * [Lifestyle]( Show more Hide expanded menu * - [x] News * [View all News]( * [US news]( * [US politics]( * [Midterms 2026]( * [World news]( * [Climate crisis]( * [Middle East]( * [Ukraine]( * [US immigration]( * [Soccer]( * [Business]( * [Environment]( * [Tech]( * [Science]( * [Newsletters]( * [The Filter]( * [Wellness]( * - [x] Opinion * [View all Opinion]( * [The Guardian view]( * [Columnists]( * [Letters]( * [Opinion videos]( * [Cartoons]( * - [x] Sport * [View all Sport]( * [Soccer]( * [NFL]( * [Tennis]( * [MLB]( * [MLS]( * [NBA]( * [WNBA]( * [NHL]( * [F1]( * [Golf]( * - [x] Culture * [View all Culture]( * [Film]( * [Books]( * [Music]( * [Art & design]( * [TV & radio]( * [Stage]( * [Classical]( * [Games]( * [Design a better world]( * - [x] Lifestyle * [View all Lifestyle]( * [The Filter]( * [Wellness]( * [Fashion]( * [Food]( * [Recipes]( * [Love & sex]( * [Home & garden]( * [Health & fitness]( * [Family]( * [Travel]( * [Money]( * Search input google-search Search * [Support us]( * [Print subscriptions]( * [Newsletters]( * [Download the app]( * * [Search jobs]( * [Digital Archive]( * [Guardian Licensing]( * [Live events]( * [About Us]( * [The Guardian app]( * [Video]( * [Podcasts]( * [Pictures]( * [Inside the Guardian]( * [Guardian Weekly]( * [Crosswords]( * [Wordiply]( * [Corrections]( * [Tips]( * Search input google-search Search * [Search jobs]( * [Digital Archive]( * [Guardian Licensing]( * [Live events]( * [About Us]( * [UK]( * [UK politics]( * [Education]( * [Media]( * [Society]( * [Law]( * [Scotland]( * [Wales]( * [Northern Ireland]( - [x] More than half a million faces were scanned in some of the capital’s busiest transport hubs during the trial. Photograph: Mike Kemp/In Pictures/Getty Images [View image in fullscreen]( More than half a million faces were scanned in some of the capital’s busiest transport hubs during the trial. Photograph: Mike Kemp/In Pictures/Getty Images [Facial recognition]( # Trial of live facial recognition in London stations leads to a false positive and no arrests Freedom of information request finds six-month trial cost £320,000, used almost 100 police hours and led to just one – incorrect – alert Phoebe Davis and [Daniel Boffey]( Tue 29 Sep 2026 05.48 EDT Last modified on Tue 29 Sep 2026 10.13 EDT Share [Prefer the Guardian on Google]( A six-month trial of live facial recognition (LFR) technology in London’s railway stations that cost more than £320,000 and almost 100 hours of police officers’ time led to one false match against a watchlist of suspects and no arrests. More than half a million faces were scanned between February and July this year in some of the capital’s busiest transport hubs during the British Transport [Police]( (BTP) trial of the surveillance technology, which aimed to help catch offenders and people breaching court orders. A freedom of information document obtained by Liberty Investigates and shared with the Guardian shows that equipment hire and police staffing for the 18 deployments across the trial cost £320,786 and led to only one alert on a watchlist, which turned out to be an incorrect identification, also known as a false positive. Last month BTP announced it was extending the trial for a further four months and expanding the deployments to include London Underground stations. British Transport Police said that since the extension there had been three positive confirmed alerts of people who were subsequently confirmed to be complying with sexual harm prevention orders or other imposed court conditions. [ Met to expand use of live facial recognition into central London by Christmas Read more]( When Transport for London announced its support for the extension of the trial, it said LFR technology “will target and identify people on police watchlists at key stations chosen for maximum impact” and would “specifically tackle violence against women and girls, whose travel behaviours are shaped by experiences of sexual harassment and sexual offences”. Fraser Sampson, a former biometrics and surveillance camera commissioner for the UK, said the police needed to show that the use of the technology was proportionate. “There many variables and all need to align: the choice of location, times of day, make up of the watchlist and likelihood of people being present and many more.” Sampson, who is now a non-executive director of Facewatch, a company that operates facial recognition systems in shops, added: “We know the technology works, but using it in supermarkets to deter shoplifters and prevent attacks on staff is very different from deploying it to catch people on a public transport network. “Success in a shop means no such people coming in. Success for the police trying to catch people means people being caught. In that respect the trial doesn’t appear to have been very fruitful. “Everything depends on the police watchlists; if you’re not on a watchlist, the live FRT cameras do not ‘see’ you and they don’t retain your image in the same way as CCTV cameras. “However, they are processing special category personal data and the technology must be used in a way that is appropriate, proportionate and necessary. It’s for the police to show how any deployment meets those criteria and – as the ICO [information commissioner’s office] has recently reported – for their oversight boards to hold them firmly to account in doing so.” More than half of police forces in [England]( and Wales have now deployed LFR on British streets, according to an analysis by Liberty Investigates. The Metropolitan police and London mayor’s office announced this summer that fixed LFR cameras would be installed in the capital’s West End. Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, has since confirmed the technology will be used on the newly pedestrianised Oxford Street. A recent report from parliament’s joint committee on human rights, which called on the government to introduce a law to address the threat of artificial intelligence to human rights, identified the rollout of live facial recognition technology as a “particularly clear example of risk”. Bell Ribeiro-Addy, the Labour MP for Clapham and Brixton Hill, said: “Live facial recognition technologies are a serious invasion of our privacy. The government should be suspending their rollout until there are stronger safeguards in place, including a proper legal framework.” A BTP spokesperson said it had launched the LFR pilot “to understand how the technology could most effectively support the identification of wanted offenders and individuals who may pose a risk to passengers and staff”. They added: “During these deployments, officers have made a number of associated arrests, including for assault, theft, possession of an offensive weapon, breach of a criminal behaviour order and public order offences, as well as locating individuals wanted by the courts and other police forces. As these arrests did not result directly from an LFR alert, they are not included within LFR performance data. “Throughout the pilot, we have continued to refine how the capability is deployed within the railway environment. This has included developments to deployment locations, operating procedures, equipment and watchlist construction. “A particularly important point is that watchlist growth has been deliberate, controlled and aligned to BTP policy. We began with a more limited watchlist whilst ensuring data quality, governance and safeguarding arrangements were robust.” ## In 34 days, our democracy faces a critical test… With the midterm elections approaching, voters need fact-based reporting to decide the future of our country. Facing declining popularity, Donald Trump is accelerating his attacks on journalists’ First Amendment rights. Before you close this tab, can we ask you to support the Guardian at this critical time for journalism in the US? The assault on the free press makes it more difficult to report on top election issues like the war in Iran, immigration enforcement, and AI’s potentially existential threat to humanity. Most recently, Trump banned CNN, MS Now and Politico from the White House, in retaliation for “negative” coverage. While a federal judge has restored White House access for now, saying the ban is likely unconstitutional, Trump is still blocking CNN from Air Force One. At the same time, Trump is using the FCC – which is supposed to be an independent regulator in the public interest – to settle political scores: The FCC targeted ABC after Jimmy Kimmel made a joke about the First Lady, and Trump suggested that the agency should punish the host of Meet the Press for making a factual statement the president disliked. The Pentagon, meanwhile, fired the editor of Stars and Stripes newspaper for “insubordination” shortly after they reported on a suicide attempt aboard the USS Lincoln, the Navy aircraft carrier reported to be in dire straits after 10 months at sea. Making matters worse, many of the US’s largest news organizations are now owned by billionaires whose personal and business interests may imperil the outlets’ editorial independence. Media critics have observed how CBS News, now owned by a Trump ally, has softened its coverage; CNN could be taken over by the same billionaire; and Jeff Bezos has imposed extreme staff cuts and editorial interventions at the Washington Post. When freedom is under attack, it falls to a determined few news organizations to ensure the full truth still reaches the public. The Guardian is owned neither by a billionaire nor a corporation and remains dedicated to keeping trustworthy journalism paywall-free for the world. **Despite the risks of maintaining our fierce independence, what sustains us – and fills us with deep gratitude – is the unwavering support we’ve seen from readers. A majority of our funding comes directly from readers. Your support not only powers our work, but more importantly, it safeguards the financial independence that underpins our editorial freedom and courage.** We know our requests for support are not as welcome as our journalism, but without them our journalism wouldn’t exist. Of course, we understand that some readers are not in a position to support us, and if that is you, we value your readership no less. **If you can, please support us today. We’re especially grateful for anyone able to set up a monthly contribution: reliable funding is vital for sustaining us throughout this dangerous period. It takes just 37 seconds to give. Thank you for protecting the free press.** Betsy Reed Editor, Guardian US Support once from just $1 We welcome support of any size, any time - whether you choose to give $1 or more Intro offer Support $10/monthly Unlock**All-access digital**benefits: * Far fewer asks for support * Ad-free reading on all your devices * Unlimited access to the premium Guardian app * Regular dispatches from the newsroom to see the impact of your support * Unlimited access to Feast, the Guardian recipe app Support another way [Continue]( Remind me in November Explore more on these topics * [Facial recognition]( * [London]( * [Police]( * [Crime]( * [England]( * [Wales]( * [Surveillance]( * [news]( Share [Reuse this content]( "Reuse this content") ### Most viewed * [ #### Tennessee to execute a woman for first time in 200 years after governor denies clemency]( * [ #### Concern mounts over slow-moving, planetary-scale ‘Kelvin’ wave heading for California]( * [ #### How Senate Democrats can stop Trump from stealing the midterms David Walbert]( * [ #### Three deaths, three states, 24 hours: one day in ICE’s quiet but ‘gruesome’ surge]( * [ #### ‘Online sex workers literally have to bare it all’: why Patricia Nilsson is exposing the world’s biggest porn bosses]( ## More on this story ## More on this story * []( ### Sainsbury’s store pauses AI scanning after false shoplifting accusation 17 Aug 2026 * []( ### Alarm over launch of facial recognition in UK shops that instantly alerts police 10 Jul 2026 * []( ### Met to expand use of live facial recognition into central London by Christmas 22 Jun 2026 * []( ### Scanned, tackled, arrested: how live facial recognition was piloted on the streets of Croydon 4 May 2026 * []( ### AI facial recognition oversight lagging far behind technology, watchdogs warn 3 May 2026 * []( ### Guilty until proven innocent: shoppers falsely identified by facial recognition system struggle to clear their names 3 May 2026 * []( ### How does live facial recognition work and how many UK police forces use it? 3 May 2026 * []( ### Essex police pause facial recognition camera use after study finds racial bias 20 Mar 2026 * []( ### Met police to pilot facial recognition identity checks, mayor confirms 26 Feb 2026 * []( ### Facial recognition error prompts police to arrest Asian man for burglary 100 miles away 25 Feb 2026 ## More from News ## More from News * []( ### ICE 2.0 Three deaths, three states, 24 hours: one day in ICE’s quiet but ‘gruesome’ surge 5h ago * []( ### Extreme heat ‘It’s just cruel’: US households hit by surge in electricity shutoffs amid record hot summer 2h ago * []( ### US politics live Former special counsel Jack Smith accused of targeting ‘entire Republican party’ in heated Senate hearing 13m ago * []( ### Artificial intelligence Anthropic ‘warns of existential AI risks to humanity’ in IPO document 4h ago * []( ### UK news Rubio says ‘foreign actor’ behind suspected plot at UK airbase as some evacuated residents begin to return home 8h ago * []( ### US military Two US navy aviators eject while landing on carrier off Virginia 2h ago * []( ### Forests UN warns of ‘narrowing window’ to restore world’s forests 9h ago * []( ### LA ‘Dangerous precedent’: authors sue LA library over cancelled Palestine event 2h ago * []( ### TV Dennis Haskins, US actor who played Mr Belding in Saved by the Bell, dies aged 75 49m ago ## Most viewed ## Most viewed * [Most viewed Across the Guardian]( * [Most viewed in Technology]( ### Most viewed Across the Guardian 1. #### [Tennessee to execute a woman for first time in 200 years after governor denies clemency]( 2. #### [Concern mounts over slow-moving, planetary-scale ‘Kelvin’ wave heading for California]( 3. #### [How Senate Democrats can stop Trump from stealing the midterms]( 4. #### [Texas Republican called for public execution of Democratic leaders – report]( 5. #### [‘Online sex workers literally have to bare it all’: why Patricia Nilsson is exposing the world’s biggest porn bosses]( 6. #### [Three deaths, three states, 24 hours: one day in ICE’s quiet but ‘gruesome’ surge]( 7. #### [Two US navy aviators eject while landing on carrier off Virginia]( 8. #### [Why is South Korea so angry with Ukraine over two North Korean prisoners of war?]( 9. #### [Judge sets $5m bond for third suspect in killing of Black woman hung from tree in Mississippi]( 10. #### [On the rocks? Scotch distilleries pause production as unsold ‘whisky loch’ grows]( ### Most viewed in Technology 1. #### [Anthropic ‘warns of existential AI risks to humanity’ in IPO document]( 2. #### [Meta’s AI agent Muse gives out user’s home address without permission, sending buyer to his house]( 3. #### [Mac mini M6 review: truly mighty but now more pricey]( 4. #### [Trial of live facial recognition in London stations leads to a false positive and no arrests]( 5. #### [New campaign disclosures reveal how much American political campaigns spend on AI tools]( 6. #### [Revealed: the five-paragraph email OpenAI used to inform Australia about agent attack]( 7. #### [AI godfathers warn of runaway ‘intelligence explosion’]( 8. #### [OpenAI scraps release of new model over safety concerns in internal testing]( 9. #### [High screen time can hurt children’s learning and language skills, study suggests]( 10. #### [Nvidia unveils security platform to rein in AI agents and $150bn stock buyback]( * [UK]( * [UK politics]( * [Education]( * [Media]( * [Society]( * [Law]( * [Scotland]( * [Wales]( * [Northern Ireland]( * [News]( * [Opinion]( * [Sport]( * [Culture]( * [Lifestyle]( Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning [Sign up for our email]( * [About us]( * [Help]( * [Complaints & corrections]( * [Contact us]( * [Tip us off]( * [SecureDrop]( * [Privacy policy]( * [Cookie policy]( * [Tax strategy]( * [Terms & conditions]( * [All topics]( * [All writers]( * [Newsletters]( * [Digital newspaper archive]( * [Bluesky]( * [Facebook]( * [Instagram]( * [LinkedIn]( * [Threads]( * [TikTok]( * [YouTube]( * [Advertise with us]( * [Guardian Labs]( * [Search jobs]( * [Work with us]( * [Accessibility settings]( * US resident - Do Not Sell or Share Support the Guardian Available for everyone, funded by readers [Support us]( [Back to top]( © 2026 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.(dcr)

Share this fact check

← Check another article or image