Fact Checker | Support Us
Sign In | Join Free |
UK FACT CHECK POLITICS

UK FACT CHECK POLITICS
Independent reporting, transparently verified by objective AI fact-checking
Menu
Categories
Latest
Support Us
About
Get Involved
Account
Follow Us
thejournal.ie 17 June 2026 at 19:26

Debunked: Estimate of 250,000 victims of UK ‘grooming gangs’ is based on bad stats

View original article →
78
Trust Score

Mostly Verified

Confidence: 0.74

Standard
Emotional Tone Low
How emotionally charged the language is (low is neutral)
Reading Level Academic
Suitable for age 19+ readers (grade 14)
Article Length Very long
4,540 words
Caps & Emphasis Normal
0.9% of words are capitalised (high can indicate sensationalism)

Executive Summary

The article’s central contention—that the widely circulated “250,000 victims” figure for UK ‘grooming gangs’ is produced via flawed statistical extrapolation and category-mixing—aligns with the available evidence. Key supporting pillars (the Alexis Jay Rotherham inquiry’s “conservative estimate” wording; ONS prevalence estimates for child sexual abuse; and the structural limitation that there is no robust national count specifically for “grooming gangs/organised networks” victims) are corroborated by authoritative sources. Some secondary, fast-changing or attribution-specific elements (exact wording/timing of particular political/social-media statements; the House of Lords speech details as presented; and certain town/county population framings) could not be fully re-verified from primary parliamentary transcripts within the research conducted, so those components are marked Unverified rather than False.

Factual Verification

Verified Claims

  • ONS analysis reports that 7.5% of adults aged 18 to 74 in England and Wales experienced sexual abuse before age 16 (about 3.1 million people).
  • The 2014 independent inquiry report by Professor Alexis Jay into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham stated a “conservative estimate” of approximately 1,400 children sexually exploited over the inquiry period (1997–2013).
  • The IICSA final report (GOV.UK) states that limitations in current data collection methods hampered its ability to realistically assess how many children in England and Wales have been sexually abused, and notes inadequacy in data on offender/victim characteristics (including ethnicity).
  • The Independent Inquiry into Telford Child Sexual Exploitation (IITCSE) was commissioned by Telford & Wrekin Council (council documentation confirms the inquiry and publication timeline).
  • Media reporting and council materials support that “over/up to 1,000” children were discussed/estimated as victims of child sexual exploitation in Telford in various inquiries/reports; this is not a precise national-statistics figure and is context-specific.

Unverified Claims

  • Claims of 250,000 grooming gang victims were shared in the House of Lords (the article’s exact framing and the specific sitting/wording were not confirmed from a primary Hansard Lords transcript in the research conducted).
  • Elon Musk “launched a campaign on New Year’s Day” on X and made the specific range of demands listed (dissolve parliament; Starmer jailed; US to ‘liberate’ Britain); these statements are plausible but were not re-verified here via primary X posts or contemporaneous archived records.
  • Baron Pearson’s office provided the quoted email explanation containing the Rotherham/Telford/Oxford extrapolation steps exactly as reproduced (this is an internal correspondence claim and cannot be independently confirmed from public primary records).
  • The Oxfordshire Serious Case Review’s estimate of “around 370 children (330 girls) may have been exploited” and the article’s discussion of Oxfordshire vs the City of Oxford population framing (the existence/publication date of the review is confirmed, but the specific numerical excerpt and the population-comparison claim were not verified from the review PDF itself within the research conducted).
  • The article’s assertion that there is “no separate legal category for ‘grooming gang’ crimes as opposed to other sexual offences” (directionally consistent with IICSA’s data-limitations discussion, but not confirmed as a precise legal-technical statement from a primary legal source in this research pass).

Bias & Presentation

Detected Biases:

  • Fundraising and membership prompts embedded around the article may create perceived pressure and can blur the boundary between editorial and revenue messaging (though not necessarily affecting the fact-check’s argument).
  • Use of strongly valenced descriptors when characterising critics (e.g., “inflammatory”, “misleading attacks”) can prime reader interpretation; however, the article also supplies methodological reasoning rather than relying only on rhetoric.
  • Topic framing focuses on rebutting a specific high-end estimate (250,000) and may under-emphasise uncertainty ranges for organised-network exploitation specifically, even while acknowledging the true figure is unknown.

Language Patterns

Emotional manipulation: 0.22

Quality Assurance

Limitations: ['Not all referenced underlying PDFs/transcripts (notably House of Lords Hansard for the cited speech, and the Oxfordshire SCR PDF) were opened and text-checked within the captured source set.', 'Some statements involve rapidly changing contexts (social-media posts, political discourse). Primary verification requires archived captures or direct platform URLs which were not collected here.']

Confidence

Level: 0.74

High confidence in the article’s main methodological point (hotspot extrapolation + category conflation) because it is consistent with and supported by ONS prevalence reporting and IICSA’s documented data/measurement limitations, and because the Jay Report’s key ‘1,400’ framing is widely corroborated by reputable secondary coverage. Moderate uncertainty remains around several attribution- and transcript-specific claims (House of Lords exact wording; exact content/timing of specific Musk statements; precise Oxfordshire SCR numeric extracts) because the relevant primary documents/posts were not fully verified within the opened source set; these were therefore marked Unverified rather than downgraded to False.

Search Journal

Query: The Journal FactCheck Debunked estimate of 250,000 victims of UK grooming gangs bad stats 21 Jan 2025

Query: ONS 2020 survey 7.5% adults England and Wales experienced sexual abuse before age 16 3.1 million

Query: Alexis Jay report conservative estimate 1,400 children sexually exploited 1997 to 2013 Rotherham executive summary opening line

Query: IICSA report limitations data collection assess how many children sexually abused offender victim characteristics ethnicity inadequate

Query: Independent Inquiry into Telford Child Sexual Exploitation IITCSE report 1000 victims

Query: Oxfordshire Safeguarding Children Board Bullfinch serious case review published 3 March 2015

Query: House of Lords Hansard Baron Pearson of Rannoch 250,000 victims grooming gangs 2025

Article Content

# Debunked: Estimate of 250,000 victims of UK ‘grooming gangs’ is based on bad stats

Close

We need your help now

**Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.**

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

[€2 a Month]( a Month]( amount]( I already contribute

Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.

An account is an optional way to support the work we do. [Find out more.](

* Continue with Google Google * Continue with Apple Apple * Continue with Email Email

By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our [Terms of Service](javascript:void(0)) and [Privacy Policy](javascript:void(0)).

Close

[](

* [Irish News]( * [FactCheck]( * [Voices]( * [Investigates]( * [Gaeilge](

[Support Us](

Sign out

| [Sign in](

sections

[Voices]( Diaries]( Journal TV](

topics

[Irish News]( News]( Crisis]( of Living]( Safety](

Newsletters

[FactCheck]( Check]( the Newsroom]( Journal Investigates](

Magazines

[Daft.ie Property]( Home]( 42 Sport]( Entertainment]( Best of the Box](

Podcasts

[ The Explainer A deep dive into one big news story]( The 42FM Sport meets news, current affairs, society & pop culture](

[](

_Sign in_ to

have your say

Or create a free account to join the discussion

Advertisement

More Stories

[](

For whom the blood flows: Metallica encourage Irish fans to donate ahead of their Irish gigs

[](

Varadkar says he got hate speech legislation wrong, would have been better to go after algorithms

[](

Cadbury owner says chocolate bars are getting smaller because shoppers won't pay more

Shutterstock

FactCheck

# Debunked: Estimate of 250,000 victims of UK ‘grooming gangs’ is based on bad stats

Claims of 250,000 grooming gang victims were shared in the House of Lords

10.13am, 21 Jan 2025

30.3k

Share options

Copy link

[Email]( "Email this article")[Facebook](

AN ESTIMATE OF the number of victims of so-called “grooming gangs” have resurfaced amid attacks on the British government for child exploitation scandals, including by prominent figures such as Elon Musk.

Cases in which groups of men, mostly of South Asian backgrounds, were convicted of the sexual abuse of vulnerable girls in a number of UK cities between 2010 and 2014 have been brought back to the fore in recent weeks.

The number of known victims and local estimates of further victims is staggering. However, the true number of victims is unknown and some figures being shared are based on a misunderstanding of the known figures, or on misapplications of statistics.

_The Journal_ has previously [fact-checked claims]( that a million children were the victims of these gangs. That number was an estimate by Labour MP for Rotherham, Sarah Champion, who, [in 2015, told The Mirror]( “There are hundreds of thousands and I think there could be up to a million victims of exploitation nationwide.”

However, nowhere in the interview did she specify that she was talking only about organised or gang exploitation (though the paper’s headline does imply that).

Champion recently told Press Association that her extrapolation involved scaling up the figures for a “70-year period”, and acknowledged that was a “completely unreliable” estimate.

That figure was one shared among inflammatory and [misleading attacks by Elon Musk]( the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his government.

Musk claims Starmer’s government failed to protect children during sexual exploitation scandals (that had occurred under previous governments).

Elon Musk [launched a campaign on New Year’s Day]( on X, a social media platform, he owns.

He has called for Britain’s King Charles to dissolve parliament, for Starmer to be jailed, and for the United States to “liberate the people of Britain from their tyrannical government”.

Musk also claimed that “a quarter million little girls were raped” by grooming gangs.

Musk’s figure echoes that put forward by Malcolm Pearson (or Baron Pearson of Rannoch), who has repeatedly made claims that there were “[upwards of 250,000 young white girls raped in this century]( very largely by Muslim men, usually several times a day for years”.

[In a speech]( the House of Lords, Pearson referenced “250,000 victims of radical Muslim grooming gangs, which in itself is probably an underestimate”.

### However, what is this figure based on?

A representative for the office of Pearson emailed _The Journal_ to explain how the figure of 250,000 was derived.

The response starts by noting that it is difficult to estimate the number of victims nationally, before stating:

“Professor Jay’s report ‘conservatively’ identified 1,400 child abuse victims during the period 1999 to 2013 out of a Rotherham population of around 255,000. Jayne Senior reckons the figure should be “at least 1,700… and could be up to 2,000 victims”. If we assume the real figure is mid-point 1,700, then 0.07% of the total Rotherham population suffered at the hands of the rape gangs during those 14 years. More, of course, have suffered before and since.

“Extrapolated across the UK, which proportionately has a lower Pakistani but higher Muslim population than Rotherham, the national figure would be 440,000 victims.

“Telford has a population of 170,000 and, from reports, 1,000 victims. Extrapolated across the UK, this would imply 388,000 victims nationally.”

“Oxford has a population of 152,000 and 373 identified victims according to the Safeguarding Board’s Serious Case Review – but with many more hidden and unidentified children who have suffered too, no doubt. Extrapolated, even these conservative SCR figures indicate that there are 162,000 victims nationally.”

“From the above and other evidence, it is safe to assume that there are at least a quarter of a million (250,000) child victims of rape gangs across the UK.”

While this final figure doesn’t have a clear connection to the statistics presented, it may still initially appear reasonable. However, there are many reasons to doubt the accuracy of this estimate.

Both the interpretation of the data and the method of deriving the final figure are seriously flawed.

Advertisement

### The data

Pearson cites data from three towns: Rotherham, Telford and Oxford.

For Rotherham, he cites “Professor Jay’s report”, the 2014 independent inquiry by Professor Alexis Jay, a former social worker, into child exploitation in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013.

Its most cited finding comes from the stark opening line of its Executive Summary: “No one knows the true scale of child sexual exploitation (CSE) in Rotherham over the years. Our conservative estimate is that approximately 1,400 children were sexually exploited over the full Inquiry period, from 1997 to 2013.”

However, note that this figure is not about grooming gangs, or white victims, or Muslim or Pakistani perpetrators. Instead, it is an estimate of all sexually exploited children in the Borough.

The definition of CSE is rather involved, but does not require gangs or other organised groups, nor for the victims to be white or the perpetrators to be Asian.

It can be read in full on page 145[here](

Pearson goes on to cite another estimate in Telford. Again, this estimate comes from [a report that looked at all CSE]( not just that by organised groups or grooming gangs.

The final figure given is from Oxfordshire, although it suggests a much lower level of CSE abuse than the others.

Again, [that report]( does identify “around 370 children (330 girls) may have been exploited”. Again, this estimate is using from the same definition of CSE that does not require organised groups, grooming gangs, or racial groupings.

Also to note, that report was looking into abuse in Oxfordshire (with a population of more than 750,000), not, the just city of Oxford. Pearson had based his statistics on the premise that “Oxford has a population of 152,000”.

It should be noted that while all three of the reports noted that many of the abusers were Asian, they did not break down their estimates of victims by the race of the perpetrators.

However, as we will see, even if these figures were correct, there would be serious issues with how they are being applied to the UK as a whole.

There are no estimates in the report for a national figure, nor are there any credible ones available, often due to the fact that there is no separate legal category for “grooming gang” crimes as opposed to other sexual offences.

However, in all cases Pearson is taking figures of all child sexual exploitation and conflating it with the victims of “radical Muslim grooming gangs”, which is a very specific subset.

### Statistical errors

A more glaring issue is that there is no reason to think that Rotherham, Telford, and Oxfordshire are typical English areas. They were not randomly selected. The inquiries and reports into these areas were commissioned because they were the location of some of the most notorious child sex exploitation cases.

In other words, Pearson is applying the rate of CSE in known CSE hotspots to the whole of the UK, when it may not have been appropriate to do so.

### Can we assume the real rate is low?

The figures of estimated child sexual exploitation in Rotherham, Telford, and Oxfordshire do not indicate a specific figure for the entire United Kingdom, nor do they represent “Muslim grooming gangs” in their area of study.

However, their conclusions are stark and do show startling numbers of serious cases in these areas.

Similarly, while the 250,000 figure is based on a misreading and misapplication of statistics, the true figure, if it is ever accurately derived, may still be shockingly high.

It should also be noted that CSE refers to a particular type of child sexual abuse, and many sex crimes against minors do not fall under that category. That should not be read to mean those other crimes are less serious.

[A survey]( published by The Office of National Statistics in 2020 found that about 7.5% of adults in England and Wales had experienced some form of sexual abuse before the age of 16, including about 3.5% of men and 11.5% of women, equivalent to around 3.1 million people.

However, the estimate of“250,000 victims of radical Muslim grooming gangs” given by Pearson is not backed up by the available data.

Want to be your own fact-checker? Visit our brand-new [FactCheck Knowledge Bank]( for guides and toolkits

_The Journal’s FactCheck is a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network’s Code of Principles. You can read it [here]( " For information on how FactCheck works, what the verdicts mean, and how you can take part, check out our Reader’s Guide [here]( " You can read about the team of editors and reporters who work on the factchecks [here]( "

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...

It is vital that we surface facts from noise. Articles like this one brings you clarity, transparency and balance so you can make well-informed decisions. We set up FactCheck in 2016 to proactively expose false or misleading information, but to continue to deliver on this mission we need your support. **Over 5,000 readers like you support us. If you can, please consider setting up a monthly payment or making a once-off donation to keep news free to everyone.**

[Learn More]( The Journal](

Sign Up

**FactCheck** The Journal's monthly FactCheck newsletter keeps you in the loop about what misinformation trends Ireland is experiencing - and how we're fighting back. Sign up here

Sign up

You are now signed up

[](

Author

[Shane Raymond](

[](

[](mailto:shane.raymond@thejournal.ie)

[](

[Send Tip or Correction](mailto:corrections@thejournal.ie?subject=Correction%20from%20a%20reader&body=+Debunked%3A+Estimate+of+250%2C000+victims+of+UK+%E2%80%98grooming+gangs%E2%80%99+is+based+on+bad+stats+%0D%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.thejournal.ie%2F250000-victims-of-grooming-gangs-in-the-uk-lord-pearson-of-rannoch-statistics-elon-musk-6596961-Jan2025%2F)

Embed this post

To embed this post, copy the code below on your site

600px wide

400px wide

300px wide

Email “ Debunked: Estimate of 250,000 victims of UK ‘grooming gangs’ is based on bad stats ”.

Your Email

Recipient's Email

Submit

Feedback on “ Debunked: Estimate of 250,000 victims of UK ‘grooming gangs’ is based on bad stats ”.

Your Feedback

Your Email (optional)

Submit

Report a Comment

Please select the reason for reporting this comment.

Please give full details of the problem with the comment...

Submit

Close

[debunked]( musk]( gangs]( Pearson of Rannoch]( Kingdom](

[Close](

[Video 2](

[](

News in 60 seconds

[](

master of platelets

For whom the blood flows: Metallica encourage Irish fans to donate ahead of their Irish gigs

25 mins ago

5.3k

11

[](

Social Media

Varadkar says he got hate speech legislation wrong, would have been better to go after algorithms

40 mins ago

1.5k

11

[](

shrinkflation

Cadbury owner says chocolate bars are getting smaller because shoppers won't pay more

11 hrs ago

93.5k

123

[](

more from us

[](

Sections

* [Voices]( * [FactCheck]( * [Investigates]( * [Gaeilge]( * [Quizzes]( * [Money Diaries]( * [Explainers]( * [The Journal TV](

Journal Media

* [About us]( * [Careers]( * [Contact]( * [Advertise With Us]( * [Gender Pay Gap Report '25]( * [About FactCheck](

Our Network

* [The 42]( * [FactCheck Knowledge Bank](

Terms & Legal Notices

* [Terms of Use]( * [Cookies & Privacy]( * [Advertising]( * [Comments]( * [Copyright]( * [Competition](

more from us

[](

Sections

* [TV Listings]( * [Quizzes]( * [Live Blogs]( * [GAA Fixtures]( * [The Video Review](

Journal Media

* [About us]( * [Careers]( * [Contact]( * [Advertise With Us]( * [Gender Pay Gap Report '25](

Our Network

* [The Journal]( * [FactCheck Knowledge Bank](

Terms & Legal Notices

* [Terms of Use]( * [Cookies & Privacy]( * [Advertising]( * [Comments]( * [Copyright]( * [Competition](

© 2026 Journal Media Ltd

* [Terms of Use]( * [Cookies & Privacy]( * [Advertising]( * [Comments]( * [Copyright]( * [Competition](

[Switch to Desktop]( to Mobile](

[](

[](

The Journal supports the work of the Press Council of Ireland and the Office of the Press Ombudsman, and our staff operate within the Code of Practice. You can obtain a copy of the Code, or contact the Council, at PH: (01) 6489130, Lo-Call 1800 208 080 or email: mailto:info@presscouncil.ie

Report an error, omission or problem:

Message:

Your Email (optional)

Submit

Create Email Alert

Create an email alert based on the current article

Email Address

One email every morning As soon as new articles come online

Submit

[](

## Your Cookies. Your Choice.

Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work. We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).

We and our 345 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage . Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.

### We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:

Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development. List of Vendors

Accept All Cookies Settings

## Cookies Preference Centre

We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework. The choices you make regarding the purposes and vendors listed in this notice are saved and stored locally on your device for a maximum duration of 1 year.

Allow All ### Manage Consent Preferences

#### Necessary Cookies

Always Active

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.

View Vendor Details‎

#### Social Media Cookies

- [x] Social Media Cookies

These cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

View Vendor Details‎

#### Targeting Cookies

- [x] Targeting Cookies

These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

View Vendor Details‎

#### Functional Cookies

- [x] Functional Cookies

These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.

View Vendor Details‎

#### Performance Cookies

- [x] Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.

View Vendor Details‎

#### Store and/or access information on a device 262 partners can use this purpose

- [x] Store and/or access information on a device

Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.

List of IAB Vendors‎|View Illustrations

#### Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 317 partners can use this purpose

- [x] Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development

* ##### Use limited data to select advertising 244 partners can use this purpose

- [x] Switch Label Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).

View Illustrations

* ##### Create profiles for personalised advertising 193 partners can use this purpose

- [x] Switch Label Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.

View Illustrations

* ##### Use profiles to select personalised advertising 194 partners can use this purpose

- [x] Switch Label Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.

View Illustrations

* ##### Create profiles to personalise content 72 partners can use this purpose

- [x] Switch Label Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.

View Illustrations

* ##### Use profiles to select personalised content 66 partners can use this purpose

- [x] Switch Label Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.

View Illustrations

* ##### Measure advertising performance 271 partners can use this purpose

- [x] Switch Label Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.

View Illustrations

* ##### Measure content performance 106 partners can use this purpose

- [x] Switch Label Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.

View Illustrations

* ##### Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 170 partners can use this purpose

- [x] Switch Label Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).

View Illustrations

* ##### Develop and improve services 185 partners can use this purpose

- [x] Switch Label Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.

View Illustrations

* ##### Use limited data to select content 64 partners can use this purpose

- [x] Switch Label Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).

View Illustrations

List of IAB Vendors‎

#### Use precise geolocation data 90 partners can use this special feature

- [x] Use precise geolocation data

With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.

List of IAB Vendors‎

#### Actively scan device characteristics for identification 52 partners can use this special feature

- [x] Actively scan device characteristics for identification

With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.

List of IAB Vendors‎

#### Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 213 partners can use this special purpose

Always Active

Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.

List of IAB Vendors‎|View Illustrations

#### Deliver and present advertising and content 207 partners can use this special purpose

Always Active

Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.

List of IAB Vendors‎|View Illustrations

#### Match and combine data from other data sources 144 partners can use this feature

Always Active

Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.

List of IAB Vendors‎

#### Link different devices 94 partners can use this feature

Always Active

In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).

List of IAB Vendors‎

#### Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 185 partners can use this feature

Always Active

Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.

List of IAB Vendors‎

#### Save and communicate privacy choices 185 partners can use this special purpose

Always Active

The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.

List of IAB Vendors‎|View Illustrations

#### Custom Vendors

- [x] Custom Vendors

Non-TCF/GVL Vendors

View Vendor Details‎

### Vendors List

Clear

* - [x] checkbox label label

Apply Cancel

Consent Leg.Interest

- [x] checkbox label label

- [x] checkbox label label

- [x] checkbox label label

Reject All Confirm My Choices

[](

Share this fact check

← Check another article or image