Britain's equalities minister has told a podcast that racism and sexism have become normalised, that young men are being drawn into violent misogyny by the "cesspit" of social media, and that police are still failing victims of violence against women and girls.
Tested against the official data, her claims divide into three propositions with three different answers. The evidence broadly supports a rise in recorded hate incidents around specific national events. It strongly supports a shift in what elected politicians are prepared to say and tolerate. It does not support the assertion that public attitudes have deteriorated.
One statistic used by her own government to make the case appears to rest on a three-year-old poll by a campaign group that has since published a figure roughly half the size.
Bridget Phillipson made the remarks to the Guardian's Politics Weekly podcast in an interview published on 20 August. She said attitudes to violence against women and girls were at "a kind of ground zero", that "things that not very long ago felt totally unacceptable are becoming normal", and that policing had shown "some pretty shocking failings … over decades". She named the shadow justice secretary, Nick Timothy, and Reform UK's Treasury spokesperson, Robert Jenrick, accusing both of making racist statements.
At the time of writing the interview remains single-sourced. No other British outlet has independently reported it, the audio has not been widely circulated, and neither the Conservatives nor Reform UK responded to the Guardian's requests for comment.
The political context matters to how the intervention is read. Phillipson lost the education brief when Andy Burnham formed his government on 20 July, retaining women and equalities at full Cabinet rank, and was named Labour party chair days later. The charge against Timothy is not new. She made it on Radio 4's Today programme on 25 June, the morning after Kemi Badenoch called her a "spiteful class warrior" at prime minister's questions. What is new is that a party chair is now making it.
Recorded hate crime
Start with the racism claim. Home Office figures for the year to March 2025, published on 9 October, recorded 137,550 hate crimes across all forces in England and Wales. On the comparable basis that excludes the Metropolitan Police, omitted because of a February 2024 recording-system change, offences rose 2% to 115,990. Race hate crimes rose 6% to 82,490. Religious hate crimes rose 3% to 7,164, the highest annual total on record, with offences targeting Muslims up 19%.
The clearest single data point is August 2024, the month after the Southport murders and the disorder that followed. Police recorded 10,097 racially or religiously aggravated offences, the highest monthly total ever, with 27 of 44 forces at record levels.
Northern Ireland's independent series tells the same story: 1,807 race incidents and 1,188 race crimes in the year to March 2025, both the highest since the PSNI began counting in 2004/05, with August 2024 again the peak month. The Community Security Trust recorded 3,700 antisemitic incidents in 2025, the second-highest year in its history and double the pre-October 2023 monthly average.
Against that sits the measure statisticians regard as the better guide to prevalence. The Crime Survey for England and Wales, pooling three years to March 2025, estimates 176,000 hate crime incidents annually. That is statistically indistinguishable from the 190,000 recorded for 2017–20, and 43% below the 307,000 estimated for 2007–09. Race hate incidents are down 39% across that period, and prevalence has held at 0.3% of adults since 2015–18.
The Home Office states plainly that its two sources "tell noticeably different stories" and attributes much of the long-run rise in recorded offences to improved recording. It also discloses that the Met overstated hate crime in every bulletin before the year to March 2025, because its legacy system flagged every offence on an incident report when any one of them was flagged. Earlier headline totals are therefore inflated by an unknown margin.
Attitudes
On attitudes, the substance of the word "normalised", the picture cuts against the minister. The British Social Attitudes series, which has asked people since 1983 whether they consider themselves racially prejudiced, last produced a widely reported figure of 26%. That is mid-range. The series has never fallen below a quarter, and it peaked at 39% in 1987 and 37% in 2011.
Ipsos found in 2020 that 89% would be content for a child to marry someone of another ethnicity, up from 75% in 2009, and that 93% rejected the idea that being truly British requires being white, up from 82% in 2006.
No post-2017 reading of the prejudice question has been located, which is itself a gap worth pressing NatCen on. The country's longest-running measure of the thing ministers are describing may have lapsed at precisely the point it became contentious.
Young men
The claim about young men follows a similar pattern of strong institutional evidence and weak population evidence. Teachers report deterioration consistently. NASUWT data cited in a Lords debate in April found 23% of female teachers had experienced misogyny in the classroom, six points up on 2023, and a YouGov teacher sample last October found 54% of secondary teachers said boys openly express misogynistic views at their school.
Harassment is also the one victimisation series currently rising. The Crime Survey for the year to March 2026 put it at 10.0% of adults, up significantly from 8.3%, with repeated harassment rising from 2.3% to 3.5%. Police recorded 623,574 stalking and harassment offences, up 4%.
But the largest recent UK study of the subject reached a conclusion the ministerial framing does not accommodate. YouGov's October 2025 research found that 6% of Gen Z men held a negative view of women, against 5% of millennials, 4% of Gen X and 3% of boomers. Young men were more than twice as likely to hold a negative view of men (14%) than of women. Its authors concluded the results did not necessarily support the national narrative.
King's College London and Ipsos found in February 2024 that 21% of men aged 16 to 29 who had heard of Andrew Tate viewed him favourably. That is three times the rate among young women and older men, but a minority against 61% who viewed him unfavourably. YouGov also found that while 76% of teachers regarded misogyny as a national problem, far fewer had noticed it in their own school.
The Tate figure
Three separate datasets published since 2024 put favourability towards Andrew Tate among young men at roughly half the level the Home Office has told the public. That gap is the sharpest documentary finding of this review.
The Home Office press release accompanying the violence against women and girls strategy on 18 December 2025 stated that "over 40% of young men hold a positive view of Andrew Tate", without a source. The only published figure matching it is a Hope Not Hate/Focaldata poll from February 2023, which found 45% of males aged 16 to 24 held a positive view.
Hope Not Hate's own follow-up poll in January 2024, submitted as written evidence to a Commons inquiry, found around one in four of those aware of him were favourable. YouGov in May 2023 put it at 12% of all men and 27% of men aged 18 to 29.
The department has not been asked publicly to name its source or fieldwork date. It should be. A government making the case that misogyny is spreading among young men is relying on a campaign group's superseded number to prove it.
Policing
Phillipson is on firmer ground on policing, where the record of institutional failure is extensive and largely uncontested. The National Police Chiefs' Council and the College of Policing declared violence against women and girls a national emergency in July 2024, citing more than a million related crimes in 2022/23, which was 20% of all recorded crime, a 37% rise between 2018 and 2023, and roughly 3,000 offences recorded a day.
The Casey review found the Met institutionally misogynist in 2023. The Angiolini inquiry examined the vetting failures behind Wayne Couzens in 2024. The Baird inquiry criticised Greater Manchester Police's treatment of women in custody the same year. Inspectors found an average of 706 days from report to trial. The National Audit Office concluded in January 2025 that three successive strategies since 2010 had unmeasured effect.
Only 8% of flagged hate crimes ended in a charge or summons, and victim satisfaction with police handling of hate crime fell from 55% to 40% between 2017–20 and 2022–25.
Where "ground zero" is harder to sustain is as a statement about prevalence. Office for National Statistics figures for the year to March 2026 estimate 989,000 violent incidents, no significant change on the year, 33% below a decade ago and 78% below the 1995 peak. Homicides stood at 499, the lowest since 2003.
Domestic abuse prevalence on the last comparable reading, to March 2025, was 7.8% of adults, around 3.8 million people, with no significant annual change. The equivalent 2026 estimates have been delayed for quality assurance. Sexual victimisation was re-measured from April 2025 using redeveloped questions and stands at 2.1% of adults, but cannot be compared with earlier years.
Prosecutions, meanwhile, are running at a high. The Crown Prosecution Service reported on 24 July that it had charged more rape-flagged suspects than at any point in 20 years, with 5,628 charged from more than 9,500 referrals. Analysts have noted the counterweight: the non-conviction rate in adult rape prosecutions rose from 31.3% to 41.1% over five years.
Political conduct
The strongest evidence for the minister's core proposition lies not in crime data or polling but in the conduct of political parties.
Timothy's post of 17 March described mass public prayer at a Trafalgar Square open iftar as an "act of domination" and said such rituals belonged in mosques. Badenoch defended him as upholding British values and declined calls to sack him, while dozens of MPs complained to the standards commissioner.
Jenrick, recorded at a Conservative dinner in March 2025 and reported that October, said he had seen no other white faces in Handsworth and compared it to a slum. The TUC and 11 unions wrote demanding the whip be withdrawn, and he said he had no regrets.
At local level, Reform UK suspended a string of councillors elected in May over racist posts. They included Glenn Gibbins in Sunderland, whose March 2024 post said Nigerians should be melted down to fill potholes. The party reinstated him on 10 June with a final written warning. Ben Rowe in Plymouth was also readmitted. Nigel Farage conceded in January that the party's earlier vetting had been "very poor", and in March called for mass Muslim prayer in public to be banned.
The comparison that gives the "acceptability" argument its force is with 2019, when the Conservative party suspended 14 members within days over Islamophobic Facebook posts. Whether the change since then represents normalisation or a different judgement about what constitutes racism is precisely what is in dispute.
Timothy's position is that calling his remarks racist is name-calling. Commentators in the Spectator and elsewhere argue that criticism of religious practice is not racism. Badenoch, as equalities minister, argued that some anti-discrimination drives politicise skin colour and that Britain is among the best countries in the world to be black.
Labour's own record
Phillipson's own government is exposed to a version of the charge she makes. Sir Keir Starmer's "island of strangers" remark in May 2025, which he later said he deeply regretted, came from a Labour prime minister.
Shabana Mahmood's asylum reforms include temporary refugee status, a 20-year settlement route, removal of support from refused families, and a consultation setting out that children resisting removal could be physically handled. They drew criticism from around 20 Labour MPs, from Lord Dubs, who accused her of using children as a weapon, and from some 150 organisations. Phillipson defends the reforms, arguing public consent for migration is essential.
On violence against women, roughly 5,000 prisoners will be released early from October under the Sentencing Act. Burnham excluded rape, serious child sexual offences and grooming on 3 August after a high-profile case, but domestic abusers remain eligible.
The social media ban
The policy the minister points to as a remedy is the ban on under-16s using social media, announced on 15 June, with regulations promised before Christmas and protections expected in force in spring 2027 under powers already contained in the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Act. MPs voted down an under-16 ban amendment as recently as March.
Its scope covers user-to-user platforms including Snapchat, TikTok, Instagram and X, while excluding WhatsApp and Signal. Digital rights groups including the Electronic Frontier Foundation argue it will cause more harm than it prevents. Technology lawyers question enforceability against overseas services and VPNs, and early Australian experience suggests significant circumvention. No evidence located supports the proposition that the ban will reduce misogyny.
What the record sustains
What the record sustains, then, is narrower than the headline claim but not trivial. It supports a documented rise in recorded racist and religious offending around specific national events, historically high antisemitic incident counts, worsening classroom misogyny reported by teachers, rising harassment, and a demonstrable shift in what senior politicians will say and what parties will tolerate.
It does not support a measured deterioration in public attitudes, a surge in violent or domestic victimisation, or the government's own figure on young men and Andrew Tate.
Three tests will clarify the picture. The Home Office hate crime release for the year to March 2026, due in October, will be the first clean read on whether the post-Southport spike persisted. The delayed ONS domestic abuse and stalking estimates will show whether prevalence has moved. And any post-2017 reading of the British Social Attitudes prejudice question would settle, one way or the other, whether the public has changed at all.
Join the Discussion
Have something to say? Join the conversation!
Sign in to share your thoughts and engage with other readers.
Sign In Create AccountNo comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this article!