UK FACT CHECK POLITICS
UK FACT CHECK POLITICS
Voting intention Labour Lab 26% Reform Ref 21% Con Con 20% Green Grn 14% Lib Dem LD 10% Poll tracker

Menu

Account

Is Iran losing its grip on the Strait of Hormuz?

gulfnews.com 04 September 2026 at 13:07 View original article →

The original link is the material being checked. It may contain false or misleading claims — we link for transparency, not endorsement.

76/100
Verdict Mixed Largely Reliable — Aggregated Reporting with Minor Accuracy, Attribution and Precision Defects

The article is a hedged, aggregation-style news explainer (Gulf News, 'Is Iran losing its grip on the Strait of Hormuz?', c.

20 checks out 5 disputed ? 8 unverified
Full analysis The complete summary

The article is a hedged, aggregation-style news explainer (Gulf News, 'Is Iran losing its grip on the Strait of Hormuz?', c. 21 August 2026) built on identifiable, largely reputable upstream sources: Kpler vessel-tracking data, Marine Insight, CNN, the Policy Center for the New South, and an ORF analysis republished by Moneycontrol on 21 August 2026. Targeted research confirms the article's central factual spine: Kpler-derived reporting that more than 80% of liquids transits over a two-week window used the Omani-side route or were 'dark' (AIS-off) transits; CNN's assessment that Iran has lost significant control of the strait; the 17 August 2026 lapse of the 60-day US–Iran memorandum of understanding amid disputed interpretations; a reimposed US naval blockade and escort operations; heavy degradation of Iran's conventional surface fleet alongside persisting asymmetric capability; and Iranian officials' insistence that the strait 'will remain Iranian'. Deductions arise from four categories of defect. First, verifiable internal date errors: 19 August 2026 was a Wednesday, not a Thursday (17 August 2026 was the Monday on which the MOU lapsed), and the CNN piece cited as an 'August 19 article' was published 18 August 2026. Second, an unverifiable and probably imprecise market data point: Brent at '$93.75 at 12.23pm Friday in Beijing' cannot be reconciled cleanly with available 21 August 2026 records (an investing.com daily row showing an open of 91.38 and a high of 92.98, versus a Fortune snapshot of $95.29 at 08:00 ET), so the figure is Unverified rather than false. Third, imprecision in the headline statistic: the body text renders the Kpler finding as '80% of vessels choosing routes closer to Omani waters', dropping the 'or dark transits' disjunct that the article's own bullet point retains — Gulf News's sister headline framed the same data as '80% of traffic goes dark'. Fourth, and most materially, the article relays contested US throughput claims (Energy Secretary Chris Wright's ~15 million bpd 'combined' figure; '10 million+ barrels some days'; Trump-administration claims of 15–20 million) without surfacing the substantial analyst dissent recorded elsewhere, in which Eurasia Group's Gregory Brew cited a seven-day average nearer 5 million barrels and researcher Rory Johnston argued Wright had overstated both components of the claim. The article does partially mitigate this by explicitly stating that there is no independent verification of the US flow claims. Language is measured, emotionally restrained and heavily hedged ('reportedly', 'appears', 'suggest'), consistent with the supplied metrics (emotion_score 0.09, capital_ratio 0.03). The dominant biases are sourcing asymmetry (Western/US-aligned outlets and US officials dominate; Iranian positions appear as brief rebuttals) and a framing bias toward the 'Iran is losing' narrative established in the headline and sub-deck. No embedded hyperlinks were extracted, and one promotional link is visibly truncated, weakening reader verifiability. Overall: substantively accurate and appropriately hedged on the big picture, but with sloppy date-keeping, one unverifiable price datum, and insufficient counterweighting of disputed official throughput numbers.

What checked out (20)
  • Kpler data show more than 80% of liquids transits through the Strait of Hormuz over a recent two-week period used the Omani route or were 'dark' (AIS-off) transits — corroborated by CNN (https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/22/business/oil-strait-of-hormuz-iran) and Marine Insight (https://www.marineinsight.com/irans-grip-on-strait-of-hormuz-weakens-as-over-80-of-ships-use-omani-route/).
  • CNN published an assessment headlined 'Iran has lost significant control of the Strait of Hormuz' (by David Goldman), reporting US naval patrols enabling alternative routing (https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/18/business/iran-strait-of-hormuz-oil).
  • The Omani-side channel is described in mainstream reporting as a UN-authorised shipping channel that Iran opposes (https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/22/business/oil-strait-of-hormuz-iran).
  • A US–Iran memorandum of understanding signed on 17 June 2026 lapsed on Monday 17 August 2026 without a successor deal, amid conflicting interpretations, with Iran's foreign ministry disputing that a binding 60-day deadline existed (https://www.timesofisrael.com/as-60-day-mou-expires-the-us-and-iran-are-even-further-apart-than-before/; https://www.kpler.com/blog/60-days-of-a-broken-us-iran-mou-the-market-stopped-waiting-for-hormuz; https://www.newsnationnow.com/world/us-iran-war-memorandum-of-understanding/).
  • US and Israeli military operations against Iran began on 28 February 2026, and Iran subsequently sought to assert control over the strait, including by establishing a Persian Gulf Strait Authority in May 2026 to route and charge traffic (sanctioned by OFAC on 27 May 2026) (https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45281).
  • The United States imposed and, as of early August 2026, reimposed a naval blockade on shipping to and from Iranian ports (https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45281).
  • Iran retains the ability to threaten shipping via missiles, drones, mines and small craft despite months of US strikes, while its larger conventional naval vessels have been heavily damaged (https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45281; https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-says-irans-navy-obliterated-us-enforces-hormuz-blockade-key-threat-remains).
  • Pre-war traffic averaged approximately 130 ships per day through the strait, and post-conflict daily transits have collapsed to very low counts (e.g. only eight vessels on a recent day, five of them dark) (https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48903; https://www.cnbc.com/2026/08/12/strait-hormuz-ship-traffic-iran-war-deal.html; https://insights.windward.ai/).
  • Pre-war Hormuz flows averaged roughly 20 million barrels per day of crude and products (https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/02/energy-secretary-chris-wright-tells-cnbc-that-more-than-17-million-barrels-of-oil-transited-hormuz-on-monday.html; https://www.eia.gov/international/content/analysis/special_topics/World_Oil_Transit_Chokepoints/).
  • Iranian officials have publicly maintained that the strait 'has been, is, and will remain Iranian' — attributable to Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi (https://www.cnbc.com/2026/08/15/iran-rebuffs-trumps-claim-over-hormuz-amid-report-of-ship-strike.html; https://www.brecorder.com/news/40435035/iran-says-strait-of-hormuz-will-remain-iranian).
  • President Trump publicly claimed 'total control' of the Strait of Hormuz on 12 August 2026 (https://www.ttnews.com/articles/trump-claims-us-control-hormuz; https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/iran-war-us-donald-trump-strait-hormuz-traffic-falls-houthis-kill-red-sea/).
  • Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he did not understand / was puzzled by the Thursday oil price spike, drawing political criticism (https://www.c-span.org/clip/white-house-event/bessent-reacts-to-spike-in-oil-prices-after-treasury-moves-to-calm-bond-market/5204693; https://truthout.org/articles/bessent-says-he-doesnt-understand-oil-price-spike-after-trump-war-escalation/).
  • Vice President JD Vance has publicly argued that US action averted an energy crisis and that Iran lacks the leverage it sought over the strait (https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2026/sep/3/vance-pours-cold-water-diplomacy-iran-battle-hormuz-continues/; https://www.gbnews.com/politics/us/jd-vance-britain-europe-warning-iran-strait-of-hormuz-enegry).
  • An analysis describing the limits of Iranian power over the strait was published by ORF and originally published in Moneycontrol on 21 August 2026 (https://www.orfonline.org/research/the-strait-of-hormuz-and-the-limits-of-iranian-power).
  • Kpler is a Brussels/Belgium-based data and analytics firm serving commodity markets (https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/kpler-sas; https://tech.eu/2022/04/14/brussels-based-kpler-ropes-in-220-million-to-drive-its-acquisition-spree/).
  • The Policy Center for the New South is a Morocco-based think-tank that has published on the Hormuz crisis and systemic fragmentation, including 'Hormuz and the Invisible Fractures: The Price of a Distant War' (https://www.policycenter.ma/publications/hormuz-and-invisible-fractures-price-distant-war-views-new-south).
  • High fuel prices arising from the Hormuz crisis have accelerated global EV adoption, supporting the article's 'demand destruction' point (https://www.climatechangenews.com/2026/07/30/hormuz-crisis-speeds-up-transition-to-electric-cars-iea-data-shows/; https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Hormuz-Oil-Crisis-Accelerates-Global-EV-Sales.html).
  • The Pentagon has moved to surge missile and air-defence production, including framework agreements to expand Patriot and THAAD interceptor output (https://www.defensenews.com/industry/techwatch/2026/03/25/pentagon-announces-major-surge-in-missile-production/; https://www.defensenews.com/industry/techwatch/2026/08/31/lockheed-martin-general-dynamics-get-framework-deals-to-surge-patriot-thaad-production/).
  • Asian refiners have faced supply stress and shifted toward US crude as a consequence of the Hormuz disruption, supporting the 'Asian oil shortages' reference (https://www.bairdmaritime.com/offshore/refining-processing/hormuz-shutdown-pushes-asian-refiners-to-snap-up-us-oil-for-late-2026; https://orfme.org/expert-speak/asias-energy-stress-regional-impact-of-hormuz-crisis/).
  • Oman has been engaged in talks with Iran over a temporary transit corridor, consistent with the article's 'diplomatic and regional talks' point (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/25/iran-oman-discuss-temporary-shipping-lane-through-strait-of-hormuz).
Disputed claims 5 claims
  • FALSE (internal date/day error, primary-source supported) — The article dates a report to 'Thursday (Aug. 19)'. 19 August 2026 was a Wednesday: multiple contemporaneous reports establish that the 60-day MOU expired on Monday 17 August 2026, which fixes 20 August as the Thursday and 21 August (the article's own 'Friday' Brent timestamp) as the Friday (https://ground.news/article/iran-mou-expires-with-diplomacy-still-in-play; https://www.newsnationnow.com/world/us-iran-war-memorandum-of-understanding/). Low materiality, but a verifiable error.
  • DISPUTED / MISATTRIBUTED DATE — The article describes the CNN piece 'Iran has lost significant control of the Strait of Hormuz' as 'An August 19 article'. CNN's own URL and byline date it 18 August 2026 (published 11:19 am), with syndicated republications appearing on 19–20 August (https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/18/business/iran-strait-of-hormuz-oil; https://keyt.com/news/money-and-business/cnn-business-consumer/2026/08/18/iran-is-losing-control-of-the-strait-of-hormuz/; https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2026/08/20/iran_has_lost_significant_control_of_the_strait_of_hormuz_708483.html).
  • DISPUTED (contested figure presented with insufficient counterweight) — The framing that Wright's ~15 million bpd 'combined transits' figure brings flows 'closer to the pre-war ~20 million bpd average'. Wright's claim is accurately reported as a claim, but independent analysts contested it at the time: Eurasia Group's Gregory Brew cited a seven-day average of about 5 million barrels, and Rory Johnston argued Wright had overstated both components (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy-and-environment/4683048/chris-wright-claims-persian-gulf-oil-trade-pre-iran-war-levels/; https://gcaptain.com/trump-administration-says-gulf-oil-flows-recover-to-15-million-barrels-a-day/). Not marked False: the article attributes the figure and elsewhere flags the absence of independent verification.
  • DISPUTED (imprecise restatement of source data) — The body sentence 'over 80% of vessels are increasingly choosing routes closer to Omani waters' omits the disjunctive 'or dark transits' that the underlying Kpler/CNN finding contains, and which the article's own bullet point preserves. Gulf News's companion coverage framed the same 80% as traffic that 'goes dark' (https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/22/business/oil-strait-of-hormuz-iran; https://gulfnews.com/world/mena/80-of-hormuz-traffic-goes-dark-and-keeps-oil-prices-in-check-1.500649281).
  • DISPUTED (one-sided framing) — The implication that Iran's loss of leverage is broadly settled. Contemporaneous CNN analysis argued the reality is more nuanced and that Iran may retain the upper hand in Hormuz, and later USNI reporting confirmed transits remained below pre-war levels with continued Iranian fire (https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/20/business/iran-economy-war-leverage-intl; https://news.usni.org/2026/08/28/strait-of-hormuz-tanker-transits-up-but-still-below-pre-war-levels).
? Unverified claims 8 claims
  • UNVERIFIED — Brent crude 'stood at $93.75 at 12.23pm Friday in Beijing' (i.e. c. 00:23 ET, 21 August 2026). Available records for 21 August 2026 are mutually inconsistent at the intraday level: an investing.com daily row shows open 91.38 / high 92.98, while a Fortune snapshot reports $95.29 at 08:00 ET (https://www.investing.com/commodities/brent-oil-historical-data; https://fortune.com/article/price-of-oil-08-21-2026/). Brent in the low-to-mid $90s is corroborated; the precise quoted tick, timestamp and contract are not. Not marked False — the discrepancy may reflect a different contract month or data vendor.
  • UNVERIFIED — The verbatim PCNS quotations ('fragmenting', 'through volatility, rerouting, and segmentation', and the 'equilibrium no longer holds' passage). PCNS Hormuz output is confirmed to exist and the thrust is consistent with it, but the exact wording could not be matched to a retrievable PCNS text (https://www.policycenter.ma/sites/default/files/2026-06/Ouvrage%20-%20HORMUZ%20AND%20THE%20INVISIBLE%20FRACTURES.pdf).
  • UNVERIFIED — The specific attribution that 'Analysts at Kpler have said this shows Iran has "at least partially lost control"'. Kpler-sourced reporting of the 80% figure is confirmed, but this exact analyst quotation was not located in a primary Kpler publication (https://www.kpler.com/blog/60-days-of-a-broken-us-iran-mou-the-market-stopped-waiting-for-hormuz).
  • UNVERIFIED — The characterisation that Fox News specifically 'showed shipping lanes (pre-war, Iranian-preferred, and Omani/IMO routes) on the Oman side getting "busier"'. Fox News coverage of the US-backed Omani route and Iranian attacks on it is confirmed, but the specific graphic and the quoted word were not verified (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/iran-warns-ships-forceful-response-us-backed-hormuz-route-challenges-tehrans-grip).
  • UNVERIFIED — The MOU's specific operative terms as stated ('no charges for 60 days, safe passage facilitation'). The 17 June 2026 signing and 17 August lapse are confirmed, but the itemised commercial terms were not confirmed against a primary text; note also that sources variously locate the deal as the 'Islamabad MoU' and as signed by Trump in Paris (https://ground.news/article/iran-mou-expires-with-diplomacy-still-in-play; https://www.newsnationnow.com/world/us-iran-war-memorandum-of-understanding/).
  • UNVERIFIED — 'Marine Insight, citing shipping data from Brussels-based Kpler, reported on Thursday (Aug. 19)'. The Marine Insight report exists and is date-consistent to c. 18–19 August 2026, but the day-of-week label is internally wrong (see disputed_false_claims) and the exact publication timestamp was not confirmed (https://www.marineinsight.com/irans-grip-on-strait-of-hormuz-weakens-as-over-80-of-ships-use-omani-route/).
  • UNVERIFIED / CONTESTED — 'The US military ... claiming ~10 million+ barrels some days, occasionally higher' and the administration's '10 million barrels daily — sometimes up to 15-20 million'. Official claims of this shape are documented, but independent verification is absent and independent analysts placed contemporaneous seven-day averages far lower; the article itself concedes the lack of independent verification (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy-and-environment/4683048/chris-wright-claims-persian-gulf-oil-trade-pre-iran-war-levels/; https://newrepublic.com/post/214657/strait-hormuz-chris-wright-oil).
  • UNVERIFIED — 'The strait's role in ~20% of global seaborne oil'. EIA frames the ~20% figure as a share of global petroleum liquids consumption, not of seaborne oil trade specifically; the article's phrasing is a plausible but imprecise restatement (https://www.eia.gov/international/content/analysis/special_topics/World_Oil_Transit_Chokepoints/).
Sources & how we checked Search journal, source grades, confidence
Confidence

High (0.85) — Confidence is high because the article's load-bearing claims were checked against a broad, dated and partly primary evidence base: two Congressional Research Service products, EIA statistical publications, a primary C-SPAN video record, a primary Kpler publication and an official statement by the named US Energy Secretary, triangulated against multiple independent secondary outlets spanning divergent editorial orientations (CNN, CNBC, USNI News, Al Jazeera, The New Arab, Fox News, Times of Israel, Washington Examiner, gCaptain, Defense News). Corroboration was consistent across these for the routing shift, the MOU lapse, the blockade, fleet degradation, transit baselines and the named officials' statements. Confidence is held below very high for five reasons: the article supplied no embedded hyperlinks, so upstream attributions had to be reconstructed and a residual mismatch risk remains for the Marine Insight and Fox News references; the pivotal 80% statistic derives from a single proprietary commercial dataset (Kpler) that cannot be independently audited, so multi-outlet agreement reflects shared sourcing rather than independent measurement; intraday Brent data could not be reconciled across vendors, leaving one numeric claim genuinely indeterminate; two direct quotations (PCNS, the Kpler analyst) could not be matched verbatim; and the underlying situation is explicitly volatile, with official throughput figures moving materially within days of publication. In line with the stated guardrails, no claim was marked False on model knowledge alone, contested official statistics were classified as Disputed or Unverified rather than False, and the single False adjudication rests on a demonstrable calendar inconsistency corroborated by multiple dated reports. The trust score of 76 reflects a substantively sound and appropriately hedged article whose credibility is diminished by verifiable date errors, one irreproducible market figure, statistical imprecision in restating its own headline finding, absent hyperlinking, and insufficient counterweighting of contested official claims.

Search journal

Strait of Hormuz Iran control tankers August 2026

Kpler 80% liquids traffic Omani route Strait of Hormuz dark transits

CNN Iran has lost significant control of the Strait of Hormuz August 2026

Energy Secretary Chris Wright 15 million barrels per day Hormuz

Rory Johnston Wright overstated 15 million barrels Gulf

US Iran MOU June 17 2026 Strait of Hormuz 60 days expired

Brent crude price August 21 2026

Strait of Hormuz daily vessel transits pre-war 130 ships

Iran navy fleet degraded US strikes 2026 fast boats mines drones Hormuz

Trump claims total control Strait of Hormuz quiet oil movements

Iran officials strait of Hormuz has been is and will remain Iranian

Bessent puzzled oil price spike

JD Vance Iran leverage energy crisis Strait of Hormuz

Moneycontrol Iran grip Strait of Hormuz weakening August 21 2026

Policy Center for the New South Hormuz fragmenting global political economy

Kpler Brussels based data analytics firm

Marine Insight Hormuz vessels Omani waters Kpler August 2026

Fox News Strait of Hormuz shipping lanes Oman busier map

EIA Strait of Hormuz share of global petroleum liquids trade 20 percent

global EV sales 2026 oil demand destruction Hormuz

US missile defense anti-drone production surge 2026 Iran war

Asia oil shortage refineries Hormuz crisis 2026

Article metrics

Emotion 9% · Reading grade 15.0 · 1134 words

The article we checked Full text as retrieved
Routing shifts and US escorts challenge Iran’s control of key energy corridor Last updated: August 21, 2026 | 08:47 4 MIN READ A screengrab showing shipping traffic around Hormuz Strait, based on Automatic Identification System (AIS) data as of Aug. 21, 2026. Iran’s long-claimed dominance over the Strait of Hormuz is reportedly eroding as most oil tankers reroute via the UN-authorised Omani corridor or switch off tracking to bypass Iranian oversight. US military protection, degraded Iranian naval assets, and growing alternative flows are reportedly weakening Tehran’s ability to dictate terms, though attacks, insurance costs and volatile prices show the crisis is far from over. Marine Traffic A MAJOR shift appears to be taking place in one of the world’s most strategic waterways, industry data shows. Marine Insight, citing shipping data from Brussels-based Kpler, reported on Thursday (Aug. 19) that over 80% of vessels are increasingly choosing routes closer to Omani waters, reducing their exposure to Iranian-controlled areas. Overall Hormuz shipping traffic is still sharply below pre-war levels and rising crude prices (Brent stood at $93.75 at 12.23pm Friday in Beijing) suggest markets remain skeptical. Iran stills raise security concerns, but the shifting shipping patterns could weaken Tehran’s practical control over how commercial vessels navigate the strait. > **Get it: Fast, verified news for FREE ... download the**_**Gulf News**_**app— simply[click here]( And while Iran may not have completely lost its influence over Hormuz, oil is increasingly finding ways to reach world markets, while ships sail beyond its direct reach. The Policy Centre for the New South (PCNS), a Morocco-based think-tank, has also cited this new dynamic, suggesting that the Hormuz crisis shows a global political economy "fragmenting” as energy markets, trade routes, and financial systems adjust “through volatility, rerouting, and segmentation.” “Maritime chokepoints, energy corridors, and trade routes were expected to remain operational even during crises — not by legal guarantee, but through a shared understanding that systemic disruption would impose prohibitive costs on all parties. The partial closure and militarisation of Hormuz shows that this equilibrium no longer holds,” PCNS stated. ## What latest shipping data shows Shifting maritime patterns suggest commercial vessels are increasingly navigating closer to Omani territorial waters to bypass Iranian-controlled areas. The US military has made efforts to ramp up oil traffic through the strait, claiming ~10 million+ barrels some days, occasionally higher, approaching pre-war flows. CNN acknowledged in a recent report that Iran may be “losing its grip”, reporting that “more oil tankers appear to be navigating the Oman side of the Strait of Hormuz under US military protection.” Fox News also reported as much, showing shipping lanes (pre-war, Iranian-preferred, and Omani/IMO routes) on the Oman side getting “busier”. While overall traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remains significantly lower than pre-war levels, these routing “adaptations”, alongside overland pipelines and the growing demand destruction through a bump in global EV sales, are increasingly diluting Tehran’s practical leverage over the critical energy corridor. > **Automatic Identification System (AIS) data**shows real-time ship tracking, identity, and operational details of commercial and passenger ships broadcast via VHF radio and satellites. **Key recent developments (as of August 21, 2026)** * Shipping patterns have shifted: Maritime data firm Kpler reports that over the past two weeks, more than 80% of liquids traffic has used the Omani-side route (a UN-authorised channel Iran opposes) or “dark” transits (AIS off). A month earlier, almost none used that route. Analysts at Kpler have said this shows Iran has “at least partially lost control”. * CNN assessment: An August 19 article titled “Iran has lost significant control of the Strait of Hormuz” notes US naval patrols enabling alternative routing, with US Energy Secretary Chris Wright citing combined transits (through the strait + reroutes) around 15 million barrels per day in a recent week — closer to the pre-war ~20 million bpd average than earlier depressed figures. Traditional AIS-based tracking still shows very low visible daily vessel counts (often single digits vs. ~130 pre-war), partly due to dark sailings and ship-to-ship transfers outside the immediate danger zone. * **Iran threats:** After the US-Iran conflict intensified in early 2026, Iran sought to institutionalise control (via permits, potential fees, preferred Iranian-side routes) and used mines, drones, missiles, and fast boats to enforce it. * **MOU:**The deal signed on June 17, 2026 temporarily eased things (no charges for 60 days, safe passage facilitation), but it expired around Aug 17 amid disputes over interpretation—Iran viewing it as recognizing its administrative role, the US/Gulf states rejecting that. * **Military escorts:** US forces have provided escorts/overwatch, struck Iranian assets, and maintained pressure (including a naval blockade on Iranian ports at times). Iran’s conventional surface fleet has been heavily degraded, complicating sustained high-tempo enforcement, though drones and asymmetric tools remain effective at raising costs/uncertainty. ## Weakening grip A Money Control analysis published on August 21 also describes Iran’s grip as “weakening” — as the Tehran regime finds it increasingly harder to compel all traffic onto its terms. Neither side has absolute control: risks persist (attacks, high insurance, stranded crews), and Iran continues to assert the strait “has been, is, and will remain Iranian.” Meanwhile, US officials and Trump have claimed growing or total control and successful “quiet” oil movements. Iranian officials reject this claim. The situation remains fluid and high-stakes given the strait’s role in ~20% of global seaborne oil. Commercial operators, meanwhile, increasingly favour the protected Omani corridor over Iranian demands. There’s no independent verification of the US claim of “10–20 million barrels some nights” oil flow through Hormuz at the moment. Late on Thursday (early Friday in the Gulf) US Treasury Secretary Bessent said he’s “puzzled” by the sudden oil price spike. Bessent’s surprise highlighted tensions as the Trump administration boasts of covert operations escorting tankers, moving 10 million barrels daily — sometimes up to 15-20 million — reducing Iran's grip on the vital route. Vice President JD Vance echoed this, noting Iran no longer holds the leverage for an energy crisis, aligning with goals of stable US energy prices and blocking Iran's nuclear path. Critics tie the price surge directly to geopolitical strains, with knock-on effects like Asian oil shortages and market instability. ## Factors affecting Iran's control Alternative routing: More than 80% of active vessels choose paths near Oman, reducing their direct exposure to Iranian maritime enforcement. * **Persistent military pressure:** Ongoing US and allied operations target coastal and anti-ship capabilities along the southern Iranian coast. * **Diplomatic and regional talks:** Discussions involving regional actors like Oman seek alternative frameworks for managing strait traffic outside of unilateral Iranian decrees. * **Market sensitivity:** The Strait of Hormuz’s role in global oil flow keeps all eyes on what happens next for supplies and prices. * **US military production surge:** A “surge” in US military hardware production, specifically of missile defence systems and anti-drone gear, could tilt the tide in the event of a renewed, tech-driven war. Also In This Package ## Get Updates on Topics You Choose Up Next

Share this fact check