UK FACT CHECK POLITICS

UK FACT CHECK POLITICS

Voting intention Labour Lab 29% Reform Ref 27% Con Con 21% Lib Dem LD 8% Green Grn 8% Poll tracker

Menu

Account

Transcription of visible text

Image Upload 30 August 2026 at 11:03 Image / Meme Fact Check

Uploaded Image

Uploaded image for fact checking

Transcribed Text

**Image context:** A photograph of the Martian surface (apparently taken by a NASA rover — part of the rover's robotic arm/hardware is visible in the lower portion of the frame) showing reddish-brown terrain with a distinctive dark, branching rock formation radiating outward like spokes or tentacles from a central mound, with low hills on the horizon. The square photo is centered on a blurred, zoomed-in version of the same cracked-ground background. In the upper right corner, overlapping the photo's edge, is a red octagonal "stop sign"-style icon containing a white camera symbol with a diagonal slash through it (a "no photo / image restricted" badge). **Transcription of visible text:** There is no legible text, headline, caption, watermark, or overlaid wording anywhere in this image. The only graphic element resembling text is the wordless "no camera / no photography" pictogram in the red octagon at the top right.
26/100
Verdict Very Low Trust Likely Unreliable / Probable AI-Generated Imagery (Disputed)

The image carries no legible text, so the only assertions available are visual-implicit ones: that this is an authentic photograph of the Martian surface, taken by a NASA rover (rover hardware appears in the lower frame), showing a dark, branching 'spider'/'tentacle'-shaped rock formation radiating from a central mound.

6 checks out 2 disputed ? 6 unverified
Full analysis The complete summary

The image carries no legible text, so the only assertions available are visual-implicit ones: that this is an authentic photograph of the Martian surface, taken by a NASA rover (rover hardware appears in the lower frame), showing a dark, branching 'spider'/'tentacle'-shaped rock formation radiating from a central mound. Targeted research shows that a near-identical scene — a spider-shaped rock formation on Mars supposedly captured by NASA's Curiosity rover, with rover hardware in frame — was fact-checked by Snopes (published within the past week, syndicated by Yahoo News and Meaww) and rated fake, having been flagged as AI-generated by Meta's 'AI Content' labelling and undermined by physically inconsistent shadows and a mistranslated Sol/date. NASA and JPL have published genuinely branching, coral-like Martian rocks — for example 'Paposo', imaged by Curiosity's MAHLI arm camera on 24 July 2025 in Gale crater — but those are pale, roughly 2.5–5 cm across and photographed at close range, not dark metre-scale structures on an open plain with hills on the horizon. Genuine large 'spider' features (araneiform terrain) exist on Mars but are seasonal carbon-dioxide sublimation features in the south polar region imaged from orbit by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, where no rover has ever operated. Because reverse-image search and provenance metadata are unavailable in this environment, the specific file cannot be positively matched to the debunked item; the core claim is therefore recorded as Disputed rather than definitively False. The red octagonal 'no photography' badge is an overlay artefact, not a NASA marking, and is inconsistent with NASA's own media policy, under which agency imagery is generally not subject to copyright in the United States and rover raw images are published openly.

What checked out (6)
  • VERIFIED: NASA's Curiosity rover has photographed wind-eroded rocks with delicate branching, coral-like shapes in Gale crater; JPL published such images on 4 August 2025, including a rock nicknamed 'Paposo' imaged on 24 July 2025 (Sol 4608). (Primary: jpl.nasa.gov / science.nasa.gov)
  • VERIFIED: Curiosity does carry a camera on the end of its robotic arm (the Mars Hand Lens Imager, MAHLI), so rover arm hardware appearing in a genuine Mars image is physically plausible; the Paposo rock was about 5 cm (2 in) from MAHLI. (Primary: jpl.nasa.gov)
  • VERIFIED: NASA's stated mechanism for such branching shapes is mineral-bearing water filling ancient rock cracks and hardening, followed by aeons of wind abrasion removing the softer surrounding rock. (Primary: jpl.nasa.gov)
  • VERIFIED: Genuine large 'spider-shaped' features on Mars (araneiform terrain) do exist, but they are located in the south polar region, are attributed to seasonal carbon-dioxide ice sublimation, and are imaged from orbit by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter — not from the surface by a rover. (Primary: science.nasa.gov, nasa.gov)
  • VERIFIED: NASA content such as images and video generally is not subject to copyright in the United States and may be used for educational or informational purposes, while the NASA insignia and logotype are protected; a 'no photography / image restricted' badge is therefore not a NASA-applied marking. (Primary: nasa.gov Images and Media Usage Guidelines)
  • VERIFIED: Raw images from Curiosity and Perseverance are published openly on NASA's Mars mission websites, so an authentic rover frame of a dramatic formation would normally be traceable to an official catalogue. (Primary: mars.nasa.gov, science.nasa.gov)
Disputed claims 2 claims
  • DISPUTED (leaning false): The implicit claim that this is an authentic NASA rover photograph of a large dark spider/tentacle-shaped rock formation on Mars. Snopes (published within the past week, syndicated by Yahoo News and Meaww) examined a closely matching 'spider on Mars / Curiosity rover' image, rated it fake, and reported that Facebook labelled copies 'AI Content', that shadows were inconsistent (the formation cast a shadow while the rover did not), and that the claimed Sol 3987 imagery in NASA's records contains no such formation. Not marked outright False here only because the specific file cannot be positively matched without reverse-image search.
  • DISPUTED: The implication conveyed by the red 'no photography' badge that this Mars image is restricted, suppressed or censored. This conflicts with NASA's published media usage guidelines and with the open publication of rover raw images; no source was found describing any restricted NASA Mars photograph of this kind.
? Unverified claims 6 claims
  • UNVERIFIED: That this specific image file is the same item Snopes rated fake — no reverse-image search, EXIF/metadata, perceptual hash or provenance check is available in this environment, so the match rests on the described composition alone.
  • UNVERIFIED: The identity of the rover implied by the visible hardware (Curiosity vs Perseverance vs an artistic rendering) cannot be established from the description.
  • UNVERIFIED: The date, Sol number, landing site, camera and product ID of the depicted scene — none are stated in the image and none could be matched to an official NASA image catalogue entry.
  • UNVERIFIED: The scale of the depicted formation (centimetres, as with genuine coral-like rocks, versus the metres implied by the wide-field framing with hills on the horizon).
  • UNVERIFIED: The meaning and origin of the red octagonal 'no camera' pictogram — it may be a platform/app overlay, a stock 'image restricted' badge, or a repost watermark; no source could be identified.
  • UNVERIFIED: Whether the poster/sharer of this image made any explicit textual claim (e.g. 'life on Mars', 'NASA is hiding this'), since the image as supplied contains no wording.
Sources & how we checked Search journal, source grades, confidence
Confidence

Medium — Confidence is medium rather than high because the contextual science is firmly anchored in dated NASA/JPL primary sources and a recent Snopes fact check of a closely matching image, yet the decisive step — binding this particular file to that debunked item — could not be performed. Reverse-image search, EXIF/C2PA inspection and perceptual hashing were unavailable, and the described version carries no caption text whereas the debunked version reportedly did, which is consistent with a crop or repost but is not proof of identity. The three fact-check hits also share a single Snopes lineage, so they constitute one independent confirmation rather than three. Countervailing weight comes from strong internal inconsistency — the image merges orbital-only 'spider' morphology with ground-level rover framing at an unmatched scale — and from the absence of any corresponding entry in NASA's openly published catalogues, which an image of this drama would almost certainly occupy. Accordingly the provenance claim is adjudicated Disputed, the trust score is set low but not at floor, and the assessment should be revised upward or downward once a reverse-image or provenance check is run on the original file.

Search journal

NASA Curiosity rover coral-like branching rock Mars 2025

Mars rover photo dark branching rock formation radiating spokes

Curiosity rover Paposo coral rock image July 2025

NASA Mars images public domain restricted use policy

NASA media usage guidelines images not copyrighted public domain

Curiosity boxwork formations close-up images 2025 Gale crater ridges

AI-generated fake Mars rover photos viral social media 2025 fact check

NASA raw images Curiosity Perseverance publicly available website

Mars spiders araneiform terrain carbon dioxide orbiter images south pole

Snopes image mars spider fact check rating fake AI generated

Article metrics

Emotion 13% · Reading grade 15.5 · 144 words

The article we checked Full text as retrieved
**Image context:** A photograph of the Martian surface (apparently taken by a NASA rover — part of the rover's robotic arm/hardware is visible in the lower portion of the frame) showing reddish-brown terrain with a distinctive dark, branching rock formation radiating outward like spokes or tentacles from a central mound, with low hills on the horizon. The square photo is centered on a blurred, zoomed-in version of the same cracked-ground background. In the upper right corner, overlapping the photo's edge, is a red octagonal "stop sign"-style icon containing a white camera symbol with a diagonal slash through it (a "no photo / image restricted" badge). **Transcription of visible text:** There is no legible text, headline, caption, watermark, or overlaid wording anywhere in this image. The only graphic element resembling text is the wordless "no camera / no photography" pictogram in the red octagon at the top right.

Share this fact check