Fact Checker | Support Us
Sign In | Join Free |
UK FACT CHECK POLITICS

UK FACT CHECK POLITICS
Independent reporting, transparently verified by objective AI fact-checking
Menu
Categories
Latest
Support Us
About
Get Involved
Account
Follow Us
theguardian.com 11 May 2026 at 06:25

‘Difficult from start to finish’: how Naomi Campbell’s fashion charity unravelled

View original article →
84
Trust Score

Mostly Verified

Confidence: High

Standard
Emotional Tone Moderate
How emotionally charged the language is (low is neutral)
Reading Level Academic
Suitable for age 19+ readers (grade 14)
Article Length Very long
2,642 words
Caps & Emphasis Normal
1.4% of words are capitalised (high can indicate sensationalism)

Executive Summary

The article’s core factual narrative—Charity Commission inquiry, disqualifications, income/expenditure totals, low grant-making proportion, interim manager appointment, dissolution/removal from the register, and specific Cannes 2018 expense categories—is strongly supported by primary UK Charity Commission publications dated 26 September 2024 and the Commission’s inquiry report. Some secondary framing and a few contextual/interpretive statements (eg partner sentiments, “widely accepted triumph”, “credibility now looks uncertain”, and the claim about UNICEF “ambassador roles”) are not fully confirmable from primary records and should be treated as unverified or opinion. Overall, the article is substantially aligned with authoritative documentation, with limited unverifiable elements mainly in characterisation, motivations, and certain role/PR claims.

Factual Verification

Verified Claims

  • Fashion for Relief was subject to a UK Charity Commission statutory inquiry, with findings published on 26 September 2024.
  • Naomi Campbell was disqualified/banned from serving as a charity trustee / holding senior charity roles in England and Wales for five years as a result of the inquiry.
  • Two other trustees were disqualified: Bianka Hellmich for nine years and Veronica Chou for four years.
  • The Charity Commission inquiry report states that between FYEs 5 April 2016 and 31 July 2022 the charity reported total income of almost £4.8m and total expenditure of almost £4.6m.
  • The inquiry report sets out a breakdown (provided by trustees for 2015–31 July 2019) indicating grants awarded at 10% and event charges at 72%, and a total grants figure of £389,173 across the table period shown.
  • The inquiry report identifies trustee expenses relating to an event in Cannes on 13 May 2018, including additional charges totalling €7,939.75 and categories including spa treatments, room service, and cigarettes.
  • Interim managers (Edwina Turner and Phil Watts of Anthony Collins Solicitors LLP) were appointed on 8 March 2022 to the exclusion of the trustees.
  • The charity was dissolved and removed from the Register following an application on 15 March 2024 (per the inquiry report).
  • The inquiry report records donations/payments made by the interim manager to Save the Children (including a donation of £47,111.87 on 24 October 2023 and a payment of £147,000 to settle an outstanding balance) and to the Mayor’s Fund for London (£50,000 on 5 October 2023).
  • The Charity Commission press notice states it recovered over £344,000 and protected a further £98,000 of charitable funds.

Unverified Claims

  • Fashion for Relief was registered as an official charity in 2015 (this is consistent with the Charity Commission report describing the main period of activity from 2015–2020, but I did not directly verify the exact registration date from the charity register entry within this research run).
  • A 2019 British Museum gala organised by Naomi Campbell was 'widely accepted' to be a triumph and 'the toast of London fashion week' (subjective/media reception; not a single verifiable fact without a defined dataset).
  • Specific celebrity attendees and specific auction lots listed for the event (Naomie Harris, Pierce Brosnan, Skepta, Alexa Chung; Matisse/Dalí/Tracey Emin works; signed Warhol print) (possible, but not verified here against primary event records).
  • Save the Children threatened court action days before the 2019 London fashion week show specifically over sums owed from Cannes 2017 and 2018 galas (the Charity Commission report confirms Save the Children was a creditor and references issues with agreements/liabilities, but this exact 'days before' timing and 'threatened to take to court' phrasing was not validated from primary/secondary sources in this run).
  • Fashion for Relief 'did not keep track of receipts or invoices' and had 'no full-time staff' and 'one bank account, which was never used' (the inquiry report strongly supports poor record-keeping, but I did not confirm every sub-claim verbatim, particularly the 'never used' bank account claim).
  • Sources close to Fashion for Relief alleged the report was part of a 'vendetta' against Campbell (attribution to unnamed sources; not independently verifiable).
  • Campbell said she was 'not involved in day-to-day operations' and denied billing personal expenses / taking fees (the existence of a statement is plausible but not verified from a primary record within this run; moreover, the inquiry report discusses trustee expenses and unauthorised payments to a trustee, creating potential conflict with parts of the denial).
  • Campbell’s charity initiatives 'helped land her ambassador roles with Unicef' (I did not find a primary UNICEF page confirming Naomi Campbell held an official UNICEF ambassador appointment; the article’s wording is ambiguous and may refer to informal association/coverage).
  • The claim that Campbell held an 'ambassador role' with the Queen’s Commonwealth Trust (QCT) is supported by reputable secondary sources, but I did not open an official QCT primary announcement page in this run.

Bias & Presentation

Detected Biases:

  • Narrative bias towards scandal framing (selection and prominence of luxury-expense details).
  • Use of anonymous sources to add negative experiential colour ('bruising experience') without independent corroboration.
  • Potential reputational inference ('credibility now looks uncertain') presented as analysis rather than clearly separated opinion.

Language Patterns

Emotional manipulation: 0.29

Confidence

Level: High

Confidence is high that the article’s central factual claims about the inquiry outcomes, disqualifications, interim management, dissolution/removal timing, and the headline financial/expense findings are accurate because they are directly supported by primary Charity Commission publications. Confidence is lower for claims based on unnamed sources, media-reception characterisations, and the UNICEF 'ambassador roles' statement, which could not be confirmed from primary UNICEF appointment pages in this research run.

Search Journal

Query: Charity Commission report Fashion for Relief Naomi Campbell banned five years September 2024

Query: UK Charity Commission inquiry report Fashion for Relief registered charity 2015 wound up December 2023 interim managers appointed 2022

Query: Naomi Campbell ambassador roles UNICEF Queen's Commonwealth Trust ambassador

Article Content

# ‘Difficult from start to finish’: how Naomi Campbell’s fashion charity unravelled | Naomi Campbell | The Guardian [Skip to main content]( to navigation](

Close dialogue 1/2 Next image Previous image Toggle caption

[Skip to navigation](

## Support the Guardian

Fund independent journalism

[Support from $2.88 a week]( from $2.88 a week](

[Print subscriptions](

[Newsletters](

[Sign in](

US

* [US edition]( * [UK edition]( * [Australia edition]( * [Europe edition]( * [International edition](

[The Guardian - Back to home The Guardian](

- [x]

* [News]( * [Opinion]( * [Sport]( * [Culture]( * [Lifestyle](

Show more Hide expanded menu

* - [x] News * [View all News]( * [US news]( * [US politics]( * [World news]( * [Climate crisis]( * [Middle East]( * [Ukraine]( * [US immigration]( * [Soccer]( * [Business]( * [Environment]( * [Tech]( * [Science]( * [Newsletters]( * [The Filter]( * [Wellness](

* - [x] Opinion * [View all Opinion]( * [The Guardian view]( * [Columnists]( * [Letters]( * [Opinion videos]( * [Cartoons](

* - [x] Sport * [View all Sport]( * [Soccer]( * [NFL]( * [Tennis]( * [MLB]( * [MLS]( * [NBA]( * [WNBA]( * [NHL]( * [F1]( * [Golf](

* - [x] Culture * [View all Culture]( * [Film]( * [Books]( * [Music]( * [Art & design]( * [TV & radio]( * [Stage]( * [Classical]( * [Games](

* - [x] Lifestyle * [View all Lifestyle]( * [The Filter]( * [Wellness]( * [Fashion]( * [Food]( * [Recipes]( * [Love & sex]( * [Home & garden]( * [Health & fitness]( * [Family]( * [Travel]( * [Money](

* Search input google-search Search

* [Support us]( * [Print subscriptions]( * [Newsletters]( * [Download the app](

* * [Search jobs]( * [Digital Archive]( * [Guardian Licensing]( * [Live events]( * [About Us]( * [The Guardian app]( * [Video]( * [Podcasts]( * [Pictures]( * [Inside the Guardian]( * [Guardian Weekly]( * [Crosswords]( * [Wordiply]( * [Corrections]( * [Tips](

* Search input google-search Search * [Search jobs]( * [Digital Archive]( * [Guardian Licensing]( * [Live events]( * [About Us](

* [The Filter]( * [Wellness]( * [Fashion]( * [Food]( * [Recipes]( * [Love & sex]( * [Home & garden]( * [Health & fitness]( * [Family]( * [Travel]( * [Money](

- [x]

Naomi Campbell’s Fashion for Relief was registered as an official charity in 2015. Photograph: Niklas Halle’n/AFP/Getty

[View image in fullscreen](

Naomi Campbell’s Fashion for Relief was registered as an official charity in 2015. Photograph: Niklas Halle’n/AFP/Getty

[Naomi Campbell](

This article is more than **1 year old**

# ‘Difficult from start to finish’: how Naomi Campbell’s fashion charity unravelled

This article is more than 1 year old

Once hailed as a philanthropic marvel, Fashion for Relief ran up hefty expenses and left charity partners angry

[Patrick Butler]( Social policy editor

Sat 28 Sep 2024 07.03 EDT First published on Sat 28 Sep 2024 05.00 EDT

Share

[Prefer the Guardian on Google](

F ive years ago, a glitzy charity fundraising gala in the British Museum organised by the model [Naomi Campbell]( was widely accepted to be a triumph. It was the toast of London fashion week and a powerful showcase for Campbell’s philanthropic mission to raise money for young people in poverty.

Awash with celebrities (the actors Naomie Harris and Pierce Brosnan, the rapper Skepta and the model Alexa Chung) and wealthy paying guests, it combined a catwalk show with a charity auction of art (drawings by Matisse, Dalí and Tracey Emin, a signed Warhol print), jewellery and luxury watches.

The event was rapturously reviewed. “The best show of London fashion week, and all for a good cause,” said Grazia magazine. “Saving the world never looked so stylish,” [said Cosmopolitan]( Campbell [told reporters]( “It’s not just about looking good, it’s about being good and doing good.”

Behind the scenes, however, all was not so rosy. Even as Campbell was taking a bow on the British Museum catwalk, Fashion for Relief was being pursued by unhappy charity partners, angry that they had been left out of pocket and threatening legal action to recover money they believed they were owed.

This week, a [Charity Commission report]( revealed the scale of the chaotic management and financial misconduct at Fashion for Relief. Campbell was banned from being a charity trustee or taking a senior charity role for five years. Two other trustees, Bianka Hellmich and Veronica Chou, were banned for nine and four years respectively.

The charity was wound up in December last year by interim managers appointed by the commission in 2022 to run Fashion for Relief after concerns were raised about its behaviour. The interim managers subsequently paid out £250,000 owed by Fashion for Relief to two former partners, Save the Children and the Mayor’s Fund for London.

One former partner of the charity said working with it was a bruising experience. “It was difficult from start to finish,” a senior charity manager told the Guardian. “If we knew then what we know now, we would never have partnered with them.”

Another said they were staggered by how little of the proceeds of Fashion for Relief events went to charity, and by how hard it had been to recover the money they felt they were owed. “I felt there was a big discrepancy between what they were telling the public about what they were doing and what was happening with donations.”

[View image in fullscreen](

Fashion for Relief opened a charity pop-up store at London’s Westfield shopping centre in 2019. Photograph: David M Benett/Getty

The commission report reveals that Fashion for Relief raised nearly £4.8m in five years up to 2020 but only a fraction of the £4.6m it spent on charitable activities – 10% – went in grants to partner charities. The bulk of its income appears to have been spent on putting on its spectacular gala fundraising events, including hefty expenses bills.

For one 2018 event in support of Save the Children in Cannes, Campbell stayed at a €3,000-a-night hotel for three nights. A further €4,000 went on a personal security team. Campbell ran up an €8,000 expenses bill, including charges for spa treatments, room service and cigarettes. All was charged to Fashion for Relief.

A year later, days before the 2019 London fashion week show, Save the Children threatened to take Fashion for Relief to court, claiming it was owed huge amounts from fashion galas held in Cannes in 2017 and 2018. It had become increasingly frustrated over its ability to recover donations made in its name.

The [commission report]( has staggering details of the administrative chaos at Fashion for Relief at this time. The charity did not keep track of receipts or invoices and ignored charity rules on conflicts of interest. There was a reliance on unnamed donors to meet expenses. It had no full-time staff and one bank account, which was never used.

[skip past newsletter promotion](

Sign up to Headlines UK

Free newsletter

Get the day’s headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning

Enter your email address

Marketing preferences

- [x]

Get updates about our journalism and ways to support and enjoy our work.

Sign up**Privacy Notice:**Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on [theguardian.com]( to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our [Privacy Policy]( We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google [Privacy Policy]( and [Terms of Service]( apply. after newsletter promotion

Sources close to Fashion for Relief said its trustees were surprised when the commission started raising questions about its conduct in 2020. They had acted in good faith and blamed outside advisers on whom they relied for legal and financial advice. They suggested the report was part of a “vendetta” against Campbell.

In a statement released on Saturday, Campbell said she found the “conclusions to be incomplete and misleading in their consideration of evidence” and that she was “not involved in day-to-day operations”.

She added: “I have instructed new advisers to undertake a detailed investigation of what transpired. Secondly, I have never undertaken philanthropic work for personal gain, nor will I ever do so …

“Contrary to media reports, I have never been paid a fee for my participation in Fashion for Relief nor billed any personal expenses to the organisation … Finally, we believe aspects of the report are deeply flawed.”

Campbell’s charity initiatives helped land her [ambassador roles with Unicef]( and the [Queen’s Commonwealth Trust]( and generated large amounts of [positive publicity]( (“Naomi Campbell is saving the world one fashion show at a time,” ran one Elle headline). But her credibility as a philanthropist, at least in the UK, now looks uncertain.

Our annual appeal to defend press freedom

0 of 60,000 acts of support

## At this dangerous time

We hope you appreciated this article. Before you close this tab, we want to ask if you could support our annual press freedom appeal at this dangerous time for journalism in the US.

According to a leading global watchdog, American democracy is now more imperiled than at any point since the 1960s, marked by a precipitous decline in press freedom – driven by mounting pressure from the Trump administration in the form of threats, criminal investigations, politicized regulation, frivolous lawsuits and, for public media, catastrophic funding cuts.

Meanwhile, organizations that are supposed to be independent like the FBI and the FCC, our radio and television regulator, have also been targeting press freedom under Trump-aligned leadership, with the FBI raiding a reporter’s home and the FCC threatening ABC’s TV licenses after Jimmy Kimmel made a joke about Melania Trump.

The response from some ultra-wealthy and corporate media owners, keen to appease the president, has been chilling: CBS News has been taken over by a Trump ally; CNN is poised to be taken over by the same billionaire; Jeff Bezos has continued to impose cuts and editorial interventions at the Washington Post; and multiple outlets have settled multimillion-dollar lawsuits from the administration to protect their business interests.

Democracy is best served by a robust, thriving free press. But when that freedom is under attack, it falls to a determined few news organizations to ensure the full truth still reaches the public. Owned neither by a billionaire nor a corporation, the Guardian remains dedicated to covering this administration with uncompromising moral and factual clarity – and to keeping trustworthy journalism paywall-free for the world.

Despite the risks of maintaining our fierce independence, what sustains us – and fills us with deep gratitude – is the unwavering support we’ve seen from readers. It is no exaggeration to say that we are here because of you: a majority of our funding comes directly from people like you responding to messages like this. Your support not only powers our work, but more importantly, it safeguards the financial independence that underpins our editorial freedom and courage.

**In honor of World Press Freedom Day this month, we’re looking for 60,000 readers to support our annual appeal with $5 or more. Do you have the means to be one of them? We’re especially grateful for anyone able to set up a monthly contribution: reliable funding is vital for sustaining us throughout this dangerous period, right to its end.**

**We would be hugely grateful for your backing to mark this global day of solidarity for independent journalism. Anything you can spare goes directly toward our work – not into the pockets of a billionaire or corporation with other interests at heart. It takes less than a minute. Thank you for protecting the truly free press.**

Support $5/monthly

Recommended

Support $15/monthly

Unlock **All-access digital** benefits: * Far fewer asks for support * Ad-free reading on all your devices * Unlimited access to the premium Guardian app * Regular dispatches from the newsroom to see the impact of your support * Unlimited access to Feast, the Guardian recipe app

Support once from just $1

[Continue](

Remind me in June

Explore more on these topics

* [Naomi Campbell]( * [Charities]( * [Celebrity]( * [Voluntary sector]( * [features](

Share

[Reuse this content]( "Reuse this content")

### Most viewed

* [ #### Polish ex-minister flees Hungary to the US after PM Magyar says country won’t protect people wanted elsewhere]( * [ #### Martin Short opens up about ‘nightmare’ death of his daughter Katherine]( * [ #### A deadly bacterium is creeping up the US east coast. How worried should we be?]( * [ #### ‘Being offended isn’t the worst thing. Being poor is’: how Robby Hoffman became a controversial comedy sensation]( * [ #### Dua Lipa sues Samsung for $15m over use of her image on TV boxes](

## More on this story

## More on this story

* []( ### Naomi Campbell claims she did not know of financial misconduct at charity 7 Feb 2025 * []( ### Naomi Campbell taking legal action in attempt to overturn charity trustee ban 5 Feb 2025 * []( ### Naomi Campbell’s charity reported to commission over Unicef link-up claims 2 Oct 2024 * []( ### Naomi Campbell admits failures at fashion charity but denies misconduct 4 Oct 2024 * []( ### Naomi Campbell banned from being charity trustee 26 Sept 2024 * []( ### Tennis legends, Naomi Campbell and autumn fog: photos of the day – Friday 20 Sept 2024 * []( ### Back to the 90s! The TV show giving a front row seat to fashion’s hard-partying superstars 11 Sept 2024 * []( ### Naomi: in Fashion – lighthearted V&A show celebrates the supermodel 19 Jun 2024

## More from Lifestyle

## More from Lifestyle

* []( ### ‘Being offended isn’t the worst thing. Being poor is’: how Robby Hoffman became a controversial comedy sensation 2h ago * []( ### Indigenous designers hold independent runway ahead of Australian fashion week – in pictures 3h ago * []( ### The kindness of strangers: ‘That quilt serves as a daily reminder of all the goodness in this world’ 15h ago[5 5 comments]( * []( ### Learn-to-cycle courses are booming in Australia as adults saddle up for the ‘golden age’ of biking 15h ago[7 7 comments]( * []( ### My mother stole these plush house slippers from me – here’s why I don’t blame her 16h ago * []( ### Shirley Ballas looks back: ‘I was crying about a breakup, so Mum smacked me round the face’ 17h ago * []( ### My fantasy solo life got off to a flying start – but degenerated in six speedy steps 17h ago[65 65 comments]( * []( ### ‘It’s a reset moment’: why are so many people celebrating half-birthdays? 17h ago * []( ### Which organisms are most beneficial to humans without us realising? 17h ago[13 13 comments](

## Most viewed

## Most viewed

* [Most viewed Across the Guardian]( * [Most viewed in Fashion](

### Most viewed Across the Guardian

1. #### [Martin Short opens up about ‘nightmare’ death of his daughter Katherine]( 2. #### [Polish ex-minister flees Hungary to the US after PM Magyar says country won’t protect people wanted elsewhere]( 3. #### [A deadly bacterium is creeping up the US east coast. How worried should we be?]( 4. #### [Dua Lipa sues Samsung for $15m over use of her image on TV boxes]( 5. #### [Saturday Night Live: Matt Damon is a stellar host of another standout episode]( 6. #### [Female nudity and art that stinks: key takeaways from Venice Biennale 2026]( 7. #### [‘Being offended isn’t the worst thing. Being poor is’: how Robby Hoffman became a controversial comedy sensation]( 8. #### [Greenlandic woman wins case against Danish authorities who removed her two-hour-old child]( 9. #### [Trump calls Iran’s response to peace plan ‘totally unacceptable’ as ceasefire frays]( 10. #### [Greece scrambles to explain how explosive-packed drone landed in its waters](

### Most viewed in Fashion

1. #### [Indigenous designers hold independent runway ahead of Australian fashion week – in pictures]( 2. #### [Soft armour, pert nipples: how London design team made Kim Kardashian’s Met Gala breastplate]( 3. #### [Why is Silicon Valley suddenly obsessed with being tasteful?]( 4. #### [Power blazer? Victoria Starmer marks key political moment in cream]( 5. #### [Body as masterpiece: nipples, skeletons and tattoos dominate at record-breaking Met Gala]( 6. #### [Jess Cartner-Morley on fashion: missed Love Story? It’s not too late to embrace 90s minimalism]( 7. #### [Product overload! Has your skincare routine gone too far?]( 8. #### [Fashion’s Faustian pact: the high cost of Jeff Bezos’s Met Gala patronage]( 9. #### [Living on the edge: what to wear with a lace-trimmed skirt]( 10. #### [Met Gala 2026 red carpet: the best looks in pictures](

* [The Filter]( * [Wellness]( * [Fashion]( * [Food]( * [Recipes]( * [Love & sex]( * [Home & garden]( * [Health & fitness]( * [Family]( * [Travel]( * [Money](

* [News]( * [Opinion]( * [Sport]( * [Culture]( * [Lifestyle](

Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning

[Sign up for our email](

* [About us]( * [Help]( * [Complaints & corrections]( * [Contact us]( * [Tip us off]( * [SecureDrop]( * [Privacy policy]( * [Cookie policy]( * [Tax strategy]( * [Terms & conditions](

* [All topics]( * [All writers]( * [Newsletters]( * [Digital newspaper archive]( * [Bluesky]( * [Facebook]( * [Instagram]( * [LinkedIn]( * [Threads]( * [TikTok]( * [YouTube](

* [Advertise with us]( * [Guardian Labs]( * [Search jobs]( * [Work with us]( * [Accessibility settings]( * California resident – Do Not Sell or Share

Support the Guardian

Available for everyone, funded by readers

[Support us](

[Back to top](

© 2026 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.(dcr)

Share this fact check

← Check another article or image